neximo64

78 ms·

931.
by neximo64 10y ago
The 'bad' bacteria compete for resources with the 'good' bacteria and simply dominate them to starvation to a point of insignificance. All that's needed is a stool sample with a quorum.
932.
by neximo64 10y ago
There have been studies that show stool transplants can suddenly cause massive weight changes in individuals. As is often the case with treatments to IBS. It matches up a lot with this study. In addition a similar study has been tried on ge
933.
by neximo64 10y ago
Yup and those people of hong kong are for more economic productive than the 2.3 million of the PLA. It's economics thats more powerful than a bullet these days. It's a sort of suicide destroying HK.
934.
by neximo64 10y ago
Better check data, KES 500 million ≠ US$50,000.
935.
by neximo64 10y ago
> The whole point of finance is maximizing profits; I think that people need to understand and accept this for us to have a meaningful discussion. You haven't factored in your thought that there are no monopolies in the financial wo
936.
by neximo64 10y ago
Why not give the leftovers back to customers? There's incentive in that to be a lower risk client.
937.
by neximo64 10y ago
Not everywhere, sometimes organisations such as the university i'm in make you install a certificate to access the network. SSL is supposed to work a certain way, in practice it doesn't always work that way.
938.
by neximo64 10y ago
What about the time saved simply through the use of information in terms of phone calls and interaction with the government? Gov.uk is so easily traversable and it's very easy to find information. You guys are so lucky. My governments
939.
by neximo64 10y ago
What about the NY reporter who reviewed a Tesla, and when top gear reviews one? Was Tesla's response to each of those - were those dishonest?
940.
by neximo64 10y ago
With such cynicism who knows, they might charge more for different people. This guy has credentials from a previous startup, hence why an article like this might create excitement for some.
941.
by neximo64 10y ago
You're saying he's selling shorting the Euro? Because it's quite small for currency positions that he usually takes. In his takes on currency, hes largely made fortunes from breaking pegged exchange rates. The Euro is free fl
942.
by neximo64 10y ago
Is there a source for this? What you're saying is quite.. radical and unsubstantiated. Also while a considerably debatable topic, refugees are going/intending to go more or less where they want. It's not that you can force co
943.
by neximo64 10y ago
> Yes, but why? Barclays profits with every customer that revolut brings/ will bring. Other banks would want to profit in a similar way. Actually they hope the startup does well so they can buy them later. Revolut's cost of acq
944.
by neximo64 10y ago
The idea of using Barclays, or any 3rd party bank, is just to get enough traction so they have their own participation method later. Also it doesn't show Barclays on the statement from my usage - it shows the end merchants details. I d
945.
by neximo64 10y ago
Sounds a lot like Revolut.
946.
by neximo64 10y ago
It's come down since you've tried, its £12 now.
947.
by neximo64 10y ago
Not to mention wired headphones work even if there are 200 people in the room with the same headphones. 200 is a large number, even a number as low as 10 in your immediate vicinity causes trouble. Use your microwave oven? Too bad. (Owner of
948.
by neximo64 10y ago
It is a tax affair. That is very clear. I don't know how there is another way to see it. Read about what Ireland gave Apple. They didn't give them cash, unless I misunderstand that. They gave Apple a tax deal, and the EU has no co
949.
by neximo64 10y ago
A subsidy is as good as state aid. Is subsidy a form of tax, no. It is an issue of tax, not even as blurry as a subsidy. China and the EU pertain the exact same way as Ireland and the EU. The EU has no say over Ireland's tax affairs. T
950.
by neximo64 10y ago
You could say the same thing about Chinese steel being subsidised by the Chinese state. A US court cannot change that. It is the same with the EC on tax issues. A country can offer something better than an another EU country can, without it
951.
by neximo64 10y ago
I know you have mentioned this, and you do not hear what I'm mentioning. This isn't an EU issue. Apple was given an unfair advantage, which is true. I whole-hearedly agree with you there, I don't think anyone doubts that. Whe
952.
by neximo64 10y ago
You still misunderstand, Ireland hasn't broken any EU law, simply because the EU has no jurisdiction over Irelands tax policy. The question of who is to judge whether Ireland 'broke the law' is mute. Ireland is a sovereign st
953.
by neximo64 10y ago
This is exactly what Ireland and a bulk part of the EU constituent countries don't want. We're scared of tax harmonisation. Where will the boundary of what makes a uniform trading environment be drawn? It is worrying that the case
954.
by neximo64 10y ago
The EU isn't a federation. It's not the United States of Europe. If you're from the US you misunderstand the system. The EU court and EC has no authority to do what its doing now.
955.
by neximo64 10y ago
Yes you are exactly right! You're missing the point on the EU though. It is not for an EU court to decide this, it is for an Irish court to decide this. The EU should be challenging Ireland to do this, not retroactively changing Irelan
956.
by neximo64 10y ago
They could have set a precedent by challenging it in an Irish court, to extend the benefits to all businesses in Ireland. They instead challenged Ireland in an EU court.
957.
by neximo64 10y ago
Treaty of Lisbon (Relevant webpage: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/general-information-tax... ) Basically for tax matters, unanimous approval is required. Except when it involves getting rid of double taxation.
958.
by neximo64 10y ago
Is is a tax and competition issue. The Irish government has given Apple an advantage using taxes. Thing is, taxes always give someone an advantage and the agreement with the EU member states is that because taxes can give countries an advan
959.
by neximo64 10y ago
If it's unfair, why cannot someone challenge it in an Irish court to get the same treatment, where does this whole EU business come in? Why should the EU have a say in how a country sets its tax affairs? This is contrary to the treaty.
960.
by neximo64 10y ago
The EU does not have this right, as per the treaties creating the EU the EU has no say in a countries tax affairs - at all. Everyone agreed to that, to stop the EU stiffling competition between states. There's not much to say, the EU s

More ›