neolog

57 ms·

601.
by neolog 6y ago
Great links, thanks.
602.
by neolog 6y ago
Yeah that definitely doesn't show algorithms are worse than humans.
603.
by neolog 6y ago
I don't see the point of submodules. If you want to make a change in another repo, do that. If you want to reference a specific version of another package in your code, do that. When would I want submodules?
604.
by neolog 6y ago
Everything about git feels half-baked tbh
605.
by neolog 6y ago
That's really interesting.
606.
by neolog 6y ago
> whose software platform does not allow me to simply add more functionality https://github.com/reHackable/awesome-reMarkable
607.
by neolog 6y ago
Which companies other than EInk are making these displays? Displaydata might but I can't tell.
608.
by neolog 6y ago
But all else is not equal. Unionized negotiations change a lot of things.
609.
by neolog 6y ago
Really the question is how did she do that? If she had parents in the field (probably a common scenario), we don't need to know much more. If it's something else, then we can ask if those conditions can be generalized.
610.
by neolog 6y ago
I think you're right but I had to think about it and might not have noticed. How did you have that ready to go?
611.
by neolog 6y ago
You probably can't tell which car is best for you, and salespeople aren't gonna help.
612.
by neolog 6y ago
Packages are part of it. But also even if the packages don't change, the preferred idioms can change as the community figures stuff out.
613.
by neolog 6y ago
> I've never understood the need to keep code "up to date" with idioms. It helps with readability to have everything using the same idioms, and it helps with quality to have everything using the best idioms. > Most of t
614.
by neolog 6y ago
This essay is taking the language author's perspective, but IMO the user's perspective is different and more important. I think what people mean when they say the language changed isn't literally "the language changed&
615.
by neolog 6y ago
I think you're missing part of the story.
616.
by neolog 6y ago
Wonder if they're from Taiwan, or were deployed there by Chinese government.
617.
by neolog 6y ago
> But let's not pretend that Amazon is the only ... Nobody's saying that.
618.
by neolog 6y ago
Does someone at google want to be the "trusted entity"?
619.
by neolog 6y ago
Which diagramming tools have you found most useful?
620.
by neolog 6y ago
The other side of the coin is why should people who don't want to collectively bargain have a veto over the people who do? (Since that's what happens when management can circumvent the union -- the union loses its bargaining power
621.
by neolog 6y ago
Workers are weaker when scabs undermine their collective bargaining power.
622.
by neolog 6y ago
I understand yours but not the quoted one. Thanks.
623.
by neolog 6y ago
The labor isn't the collective resource. It's the negotiating power.
624.
by neolog 6y ago
It's a commons problem; voluntary membership means free-riders will destroy the collective resource.
625.
by neolog 6y ago
> if I was Musk I would want them nowhere near my business Unions advocate for workers, not management. It's normal for management to not want unions.
626.
by neolog 6y ago
Python's zope.interface can do it. Julia's still figuring out their trait system, but some implementations allow that. I don't know Clojure but I wouldn't be surprised to hear if their Spec allows it.
627.
by neolog 6y ago
That's clever. But in a programming language (instead of a composition of coreutils), I would use a filename() function or something.
628.
by neolog 6y ago
What is a use case for this?
629.
by neolog 6y ago
Someone in the replies says no
630.
by neolog 6y ago
I don't see the problem. If a bunch of non-google companies pooled resources to make a crawl, that would reduce market concentration, not increase it.

More ›