nbar1

10 ms·

61.
by nbar1 6y ago
Thanks for the links, definitely gonna check it out!
62.
by nbar1 6y ago
Unfortunately for me, I was a remote worker already (worked there for a month shy of 6 years). Hopefully, my position (React/Node FS Dev) is in high enough demand after all this to resume working remotely with a comfortable salary. I&#
63.
by nbar1 6y ago
I feel for the people at Tor who were let go. My company was in the same position and I was unfortunately on the list of people who had their position terminated. While I am upset that I am now unemployed I also can understand how a company
64.
by nbar1 6y ago
I use Amazon Smile to donate to Tor. It's not much, but it's something.
65.
by nbar1 7y ago
I wouldn't give this website my information.
66.
by nbar1 7y ago
To check for outstanding warrants.
67.
by nbar1 7y ago
I would quite like to know when a PR is in movement that I'm involved in.
68.
by nbar1 7y ago
Practices like this are ridiculous. Of course you should be respectful in a code review, but you should also be to the point and ask questions if you don't understand why they did something they did, even if there is a "better&quo
69.
by nbar1 7y ago
The below information is incorrect. Chrome HD Themes has the most extensions, not most downloads Original comment: That "developer" is Chrome HD Themes and the extensions are themes.
70.
by nbar1 7y ago
Is GitHub not indexed by Google anyway? I'm probably out of the loop on something here.
71.
by nbar1 8y ago
The content on those domains is highly relevant and appears to be thorough. What do you think a non-profit could have used them for that would be better?
72.
by nbar1 8y ago
Second one I got was an Indian man.
73.
by nbar1 8y ago
It was never dropped, it is still in Google's Code of Conduct. It's not, however, included in Alphabets. https://abc.xyz/investor/other/google-code-of-conduct/
74.
by nbar1 8y ago
This is just how business works at that level. Don't like it? Me either, but Google is still playing by the rules.
75.
by nbar1 8y ago
I feel like at this point, anyone using Facebook still is using it because of their addiction or for business purposes.
76.
by nbar1 8y ago
Only the Google Chromebooks are priced high, and still isn't even close to the Macbook. There are many offerings from other company for just a few hundred dollars that run Chrome OS.
77.
by nbar1 8y ago
Not really. People could be in debt, people could be taking care of their parents or other family members. You are making a lot of assumptions because you think everyone who works at Google is rich.
78.
by nbar1 8y ago
Not everyone is in a position to walk away from a job in hopes to land a new one in a week. People have families, bills, obligations.
79.
by nbar1 8y ago
Yes, you can advertise to only one sex. The problem is they advertised a job ad.
80.
by nbar1 8y ago
Unfortunately, until Apple gets onboard we aren't willing to take advantage of them at my job.
81.
by nbar1 8y ago
>The review concluded there was "overwhelming evidence" they were far safer than smoking and "of negligible risk to bystanders"
82.
by nbar1 8y ago
The only marketing I've seen for it was the tape on my packages the last few weeks.
83.
by nbar1 8y ago
I don't see this as an issue. Google does it with all of their products. If you own a flooring company and a cabinet company, you're going to try to convince your flooring customers to buy your cabinets.
84.
by nbar1 8y ago
If you read the comment you replied to, he states they are vulnerable to one of the big 5 competing against them and wiping out their business model. This isn't hard to classify at all, it's a matter of fact.
85.
by nbar1 8y ago
People who don't go early and wait around.
86.
by nbar1 8y ago
We've come full circle. Except this circle has adware.
87.
by nbar1 8y ago
I like what the guy did, but am I the only one who feels most of these "I did x with y" articles always end up trying to sell you something? What happened to just sharing our knowledge with each other?
88.
Code Fearlessly (2010)(cam.ly)
2 points by nbar1 8y ago|0 comments
89.
by nbar1 9y ago
The point is certainly valid. If Google steps out of this, they are just going to find someone to fill those shoes.
90.
by nbar1 9y ago
I think people might be missing a use case... It will map your exact body type and then allow you to try on clothes with AR through your phone screen.

More ›