4 ms·
>The review concluded there was "overwhelming evidence" they were far safer than smoking and "of negligible risk to bystanders"
by nbar1 8y ago
>The review concluded there was "overwhelming evidence" they were far safer than smoking and "of negligible risk to bystanders"
- onemoresoop 8y agoRemember the days when people were smoking in offices, univs, hospitals, etc? Vaping is 100x less disgusting, less harmful. I see people vaping and it doesn't smell, they don't leave ashes and butts everywhere and it doesn't bother me at all. The second hand nicotine vapor is not "a thing" unless you go to a room where a visible cloud of e-cigs vapor is present. I think we are much better off with people vaping than smoking. The only problem is that kids might start vaping because a lot of these juices are fruit flavored.
- k_ 8y agoThere are e-cigs that do smell, the one in my previous company "vaping" in the open space used some kind of flavor that had a strong [unpleasant] smell, even over 5 meters away. Overall it's a great improvement. I just hope this improvement doesn't come with regressions (more [e-]smokers, especially in public areas and maybe in newer generations) precisely because it is so great an improvement.
- onemoresoop 8y agoYou're absolutely right and those are somewhat bothersome. Also there are some units, the bigger ones I've noticed, that have the ability to create a thick dense cloud of vapor as if an invoked spirit is about to materialize into Alladin. These are not cool at all. At the same time i saw small electronic cigarettes that people use discretely and I think that's a big win to the old nasty and stinky analog cigarettes.
- Retric 8y agonegligible != to zero. I don't think people have the right to harm others in the work place, so a ban is still appropriate.