Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
natmaka
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
76 ms
·
841.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
The recycling industry is growing up: https://northvolt.com/
842.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
We already build grids of grids https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_area_synchronous_grid The European one is quite impressive and grows at a fair pace: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_gri
843.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
As far as I know China didn't announce anything. Where is the official announcement? The source is a Bloomberg article ( https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-11-02/china-cli... ) which states th
844.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
The EPR is a new generation (new reactor design). As usual ramping it up implies to build one (the 'tête de série') or at max a few ones, then to launch series. We always did it this way. Since 2005 4 projects were launched (Fran
845.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
Indeed. In France the nuclear sector (plants, fuel, research...) has about 220000 jobs.
846.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
> I mean you've written it yourself: "almost" Nope. I was quoting you (with the '>' sign, just as you do). Please re-read. > And then you're leaving out secial-security costs False, once more. France
847.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
> Flamanville EPR is considered as some sort of prototype No, it officially is a "tête de série" (meaning among the firsts of a series). It cannot be a prototype because this very model, the EPR, was sold to Finland and the co
848.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
> the 2 units at Civaux Nuclear Power Plant, took 13 and 11 years from construction start in 1988/1991 to commercial operation in 2002: At the time France was simultaneously building many reactors, see: https://fr.wikiped
849.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
The poll details: https://www.jaif.or.jp/en/japanese-opinion-poll-finds-that-v... 60% want "the nuclear power to be discontinued" either right now or gradually, and ~27% "don't know". IMHO the
850.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
> Sorry, your price link is contradicting you .32 is in my book far from "almost 2 times" .19 > Germans already are having the highest income-tax and social-security costs of the developed world Nope, the tax burden is way h
851.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
"49 percent was asking for a gradual exit from nuclear energy" isn't exactly "not opposing".
852.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
Please read my other reply published nearby: we are not embarked into an efficiency race. Efficiency (of any renewable-source based system) is a mean, not an end. As for efficiency: https://www.vicat.com/news/vicat-sch
853.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
We are not embarked in a race on efficiency. A system able which is: - able to store otherwise is wasted energy - affordable (the total price of this storing-then-reconversion into electricity is OK) is adequate - storing in adequate volum
854.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
France already did so. Their current reactor architecture (pressurized-water) was Westinghouse's (France bought a license in the 1970's). They even coined a partnership, see https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021&
855.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
I completely fail to understand why some think France didn't try to build new reactors for decades. This is not true! We tried , however it is a running disaster. The problem here isn't "political will". See: https:&#
856.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
The political will didn't fail. The EPR reactor in Flamanville is a work-in-progress since 2007. Albeit it was scheduled to start in 2012 it isn't yet. It will cost at least 19.1 billions euros (initial budget: 3.4 billions eur
857.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
> German consumers still don't do that, despite paying the highest electricity bills in the developed world (almost twice of what the French pay). No (France .32, Germany .19), and this comparison isn't sound because the financ
858.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
> after Fukushima > why wasn't it started years earlier The phase-out was announced in 2000 and started https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_phase-out#German... and was effective: https://e
859.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
These 'fast breeder reactors' are difficult to tame. In France: ASTRID burnt ~700 millions euros and didn't get past plans. Before it the 'Superphenix' project burnt ~8 billions euros, was built, had a long chain o
860.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
Not so sure about Banquiao, at it "took place during the Chinese Cultural Revolution when most people were busy with the "revolution" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Banqiao_Dam_failure The "Cult
861.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
> China The EPR projects weren't such successes, they were overbudget and overschedule. Then an incident lead to a shutdown for examination. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_(nuclear_reactor)#Taishan_...
862.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
Veolia and GE have a deal https://www.veolia.com/en/news/united-states-veolia-makes-ce... In France recycling is mandatory (by law). The concrete is recyclable, and appreciated: https://archinect.com&#x
863.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
Energy storage: there is a gorilla in a corner of the room, see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03603... Solar and wind often overproduce (leading to negative prices). This (other
864.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
> The Chinese have committed This may be more complicated than that, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29159944 > Japan reactivating nuclear reactors: Japan invested on nuclear then nowadays don't want it
865.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
Another discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29151741
866.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
It is based upon a lie, please read https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29169515
867.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
Macron said "We are going, for the first time in decades, to relaunch the construction of nuclear reactors in our country". This is a blatant lie, as France launched a project and never ceased trying to build. However it failed f
868.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
As far as I know China didn't announce anything. Where is the official announcement? The source is a Bloomberg article ( https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-11-02/china-cli... ) which states th
869.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
Using IDs may lead to a performance gain if it leads to a smaller database: less bytes to read/write/cache => less I/O volume, and better cache hits compensating the potentially higher amounts of seeks on mass storage. Th
870.
▲
by
natmaka
5y ago
https://github.com/kellen/urchinfs ?
More ›