natch

18 ms·

241.
by natch 2y ago
Teslas have plenty of physical buttons. You've been lied to.
242.
by natch 2y ago
The geography matters, but just speaking for the US, rational buyers who want an EV will learn their lesson and come to Tesla. Maybe after one last ICE mistake but eventually. Superchargers are not just a bullet point, having them or not is
243.
by natch 2y ago
You should short the stock, then.
244.
by natch 2y ago
Or with Tesla leave your card in your wallet, you won't need it. The station IDs the car and charges the card on file in your account. No card, no scan, no tap, no need to use an app, just plug in. At least in the US. Hopefully they ar
245.
by natch 2y ago
You can sell something at a markup but a gas station sells so many $50 fill ups per day compared to an EV station, the gas station probably has about 1000X more revenue. Sure their margin might be better than a razor-thin gas station margin
246.
by natch 2y ago
Good link, terrifying read, thank you.
247.
by natch 2y ago
Your point was well put and would have landed well five years ago, but today the unstoppable (short of global, civilization-ending catastrophe) march toward ubiquitous smart robots refutes that this is a chain of unlikely events. The built
248.
by natch 2y ago
It's bizarre that an article this detailed would not delve into the likelihood that the word "human" can reasonably be stretched to include "future human-like technically evolved conscious beings who can easily thrive in
249.
by natch 2y ago
>It is very inhospitable to biological humans. Current biological humans. And as you allude to, updated and replacement body plans are easily in the cards on a decades timescale.
250.
by natch 2y ago
They can FOAD. They took my money, one of the most expensive iOS apps I ever paid for. Around $40 I recall. I paid it because I thought it would be a good long term value. Yeah I’m willing to pay for something useful that one person could w
251.
by natch 2y ago
More like "point missed." The singularity is about brains, not bodies. Of course physical instantiations of embodied agents will lag a very short bit when we first hit AGI.
252.
by natch 2y ago
and… false
253.
by natch 2y ago
I'm only half way through that and it IS good, but I wish they wouldn't burn so much valuable time on recaps of the history that has already been told in so many other interviews, and get on to talking about the real changes we sh
254.
by natch 2y ago
Strong gatekeeping vibes. "Not even wrong" is perfect for this sort of fixation with labels and titles and an odd seemingly resentful take that gwern has being an AI influencer as a specific goal.
255.
by natch 2y ago
Cool, but if only Apple could get their video thumbnails on macOS to use the same frame as their video thumbnails on iOS, it would be a huge step forward. Should not even be hard, no AI needed. It's absolutely nuts that this has been b
256.
by natch 2y ago
Unknown to whom?
257.
by natch 2y ago
I thought contractors employed mostly by overseas affiliated staffing firms partnering with IS&T run the data centers, but what do I know. I actually don’t. But the wording is odd. Super weird to take the effort to make the wording so n
258.
by natch 2y ago
Then say that. In the document.
259.
by natch 2y ago
As to the trust loss, we seem to be already past that. It seems to me they are now in the stage of faking it.
260.
by natch 2y ago
You're getting taken in by a misdirection. >for them to run different software than they say they do. They don't even need to do that. They don't need to do anything different than they say. They already are saying only th
261.
by natch 2y ago
>No privileged runtime access: PCC must not contain privileged interfaces that might enable Apple site reliability staff to bypass PCC privacy guarantees. What about other staff and partners and other entities? Why do they always insert
262.
by natch 2y ago
This was a self-inflicted wound. * Weak, deceptive, evasive candidate * Entitled attitude in the party * Unknown people running the party. Still. * Full embrace of cray cray ideologies, rejection of meritocracy * Disengagement and withdrawa
263.
by natch 2y ago
From the page: Here is how your rights will be affected by this litigation if the FSFE is successful: As a developer: ... blah blah ... As a user: Enhanced freedom of choice: Users will enjoy more freedom of
264.
by natch 2y ago
I didn't say there weren't other things that make companies worry about liability. Not sure you read what I said though.
265.
by natch 2y ago
It’s kind of an unorthodox take, but I’m guessing the idea is that if corporations perceived that they didn’t have secure ways to protect stuff, they would refrain from gathering as much stuff, because they would be afraid of the liability.
266.
by natch 2y ago
Too hard, I was hoping you would do it.
267.
by natch 2y ago
Is this just a fork of yet-dlp with credits rewritten?
268.
by natch 2y ago
Reasonable... lol. If he was reasonable his list of accomplishments would look more like mine... (sad face).
269.
by natch 2y ago
I was not saying that there absolutely is always dust there. I was saying the system is doing a best efforts action just in case there is dust or snow or other debris there which there sometimes is. I'm guessing they have birds in
270.
by natch 2y ago
>they still start wiping in dry conditions That's for safety if a flake of dirt or dust lands on the front window right over where one of the cameras are, it will do a wipe and try to get rid of the thing that is distorting the imag

More ›