Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
natch
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
631.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
ok I totally get this. Microsoft co-opted “DNS” as “Digital Nervous System” to try to exploit business decision makers’ dim acquaintance with the term. They had a pattern of doing this with other internet acronyms back in the day. Annoying
632.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Cool. Not being privy to Harry Potter inside baseball I could not tell from your original comment whether you had seen that FAQ entry.
633.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
They already acknowledged this in the faq fwiw.
634.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
>horcrux. Looks like somebody beat me to both the name and concept, however this repo doesn't support thresholds of horcruxes "this repo" I wonder if they mean "that repo." I realize it can be read both ways, but
635.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
I for one agree we should not, but also we shouldn't underestimate our opponents and assume that we are or will stay ahead.
636.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Awesome. I suppose you mean pottery shards of course.
637.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
You do realize that coal then gets dug up and burned, right? Also, have you heard of fracking? It's a blend of the words "cracking" and "fracture" and why is that? Like virtually any geology, there are cracks, throu
638.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
There exists an incentive for corruption, is more like it. Therefore we should be skeptical. Then, with a skeptical eye, we examine the scheme and we see that in order to capture carbon, they are first freeing equivalent carbon that was alr
639.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Breaking changes are part of the deal. It’s no secret that iOS has a new major version every year. If there’s blame here, it’s on DJI. And usually the breaking changes only come after many years of advance notification from Apple, unless it
640.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
That's an accusation, but there are other more charitable interpretations of what's going on. You are free to choose your own interpretation though.
641.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Updates are opt in, you don't have to accept them. The Ukraine thing is more nuanced than the media makes it out to be. They are in the business of selling drama.
642.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
>Those empty caverns are the largest opportunity for capture How large? We have 42,592 trillion cubic feet of CO2 in the atmosphere, and the projected total natural gas that can be extracted going forward in the US over the next 85 years
643.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Great post, thank you. As you acknowledge in your wording, we don't know for sure, but for me this part states it very clearly what might unfortunately be a key driver at least at this stage of that company: >Depending on how the or
644.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
He's actually a good guy, though it's your choice if he rubs you the wrong way.
645.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Just buy a Tesla. For those of you who think for yourselves and are still reading, I'll explain why. They have the best practices of any connected car listed, it's all opt in, and they collect nothing tied to your ID. Privacy asid
646.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
What I’m rejecting is a kind of perpetual motion machine style setup where you need to redirect a bunch of already captured CO2 in order to capture an equivalent amount. If however the resulting CO2 as they cycle this can be and is in pract
647.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
>but capture it For certain values of “capture” TFA says it could be pumped underground, etc. “could be” in theory if that gets proved out and doesn’t leak. For a period. At least for long enough to collect the tax credit. Meantime, it w
648.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
*claiming to pump underground. ftfy If pumping underground even works beyond the timeline needed to claim the tax credit.
649.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
> so that it can be processed and stored it was already processed and stored. In the limestone. By nature. For free. Just leave the CO2 stored in the limestone alone, and find some other way to capture the CO2 from the atmosphere.
650.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
The CO2 in the limestone was already sequestered by nature. They are freeing it, which is the opposite of what is needed. Leave the limestone alone and that CO2 remains sequestered, no additional energy needed. This sounds like a way to jus
651.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
They had coordination between kings of different regions. They had messengers using authentication bearer tokens, for god's sake. Edit: Seems like evidence of something, though not airtight proof of centralization. Reference: https:&#
652.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
> Due to log retention policies, we don’t have logs with specific evidence No “this issue has been corrected” for this one. Are we still budgeting storage like it’s the 1990s for logs?
653.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Of course it didn’t happen in a vacuum. And Hillary was a horrible candidate imho.
654.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
That’s not the only failure mode though so it’s possible you’re missing something. Also I said “I think” which means I’m describing my own opinion, not stating with certainty that I know something to be the case about him.
655.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
I think Yann LeCun is living in a fantasy world. He seems unaware that we already saw a massive failure on his watch where a US election (2016) was tipped by algorithmic intervention far beyond anything that had come before, using his compa
656.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
I think "it" meant helium? But regardless we may reduce our natural gas extraction significantly in the future. Even if there's plenty left in the ground. So I'd imagine that reduction of extraction would also reduce acc
657.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Since we elect idiots, we get idiotic laws and actions. And then our children get the problems we deserve.
658.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Awesome, please take my money!
659.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
I went to an EFF event where there was a guy from Sling Media (Slingbox, remember them?) who said the one point that overrides all others in importance, which he learned from EFF, is that updates should never be force pushed. Designing a de
660.
▲
by
natch
3y ago
Thank you, exactly. This was all that needed to be said and the story is incongruous without some reckoning of this.
More ›