natch

41 ms·

661.
by natch 3y ago
Thanks for clarifying. I chose what seemed the most likely interpretation of an ambiguity. If it works for you, think of it as a drawing out of the argument, instead of a counterpoint to you. I’m arguing against the others who think there h
662.
by natch 3y ago
The data is not being used in the way alarmists describe things, so it’s on the alarmists to explain why they think there is a problem.
663.
by natch 3y ago
>when told what these companies are doing lol The models are not doing what advocates of this kind of setting say they are doing, so it will be nice when the concerns fade away. Using data to train models is what they are doing. Storing
664.
by natch 3y ago
The crossover is 1.5 years, so EVs are a win from then onward.
665.
by natch 3y ago
We thought it wasn’t an option until we tried. Just need a long cord and the right parking place. I would agree most don’t have it though, for now.
666.
by natch 3y ago
EPA range is calculated based on driving very conservatively. Once you’re behind the wheel, you won’t feel like driving that way. And superchargers are so plentiful so it’s not a problem on most routes. If it is a problem for your area, sti
667.
by natch 3y ago
Hah thank you for introducing me to that.
668.
by natch 3y ago
This is just a feeling, but for me I was tired of the quirkiness of Perl, and Ruby offered yet more quirkiness. Python offered an opinionated and more crisp proposition, stating explicitly the goal among other things of having (paraphrasing
669.
by natch 3y ago
ok
670.
by natch 3y ago
Of course there's a difference, but if the incident causes a fire that then spreads, that is very bad in either case. It's more likely the law exists from the fire concern than out of concern for the pilots, and the law is just wa
671.
by natch 3y ago
The author never mentions the alternative ChatGPT. It’s an article about Copilot, yet people are commenting as if it’s an article about coding with AI tools generally. Copilot is very intrusive and is just one of the available options.
672.
by natch 3y ago
Thanks for mentioning that! I learned something.
673.
by natch 3y ago
They have a common beginner's mistake in their example usage of sha256sum. Nothing that would affect the git usage, to be fair... unless they have related tooling that does this. > echo "please hash this data" | sha2
674.
by natch 3y ago
If it's a hazard to a crew, it could also be a hazard to electronics that pilot the craft. If the craft comes down as a result, that could be bad news for any forests, buildings, people, etc. nearby on the ground. Glad to help!
675.
by natch 3y ago
Thank you for strengthening my point.
676.
by natch 3y ago
Thanks for clarifying. To me it's just never obvious what their real issue is. I suspect someone who succeeds at stuff while daring to question everything and have fun at it is just triggering for a lot of folks.
677.
by natch 3y ago
Are you convinced that your antistatic envelope is the only potential source of sparks, arcs, flames or other catalysts of ignition? Are you aware of squirrels, chipmunks, birds, spiders, insects, wires, and branches? You do say that you wi
678.
by natch 3y ago
You might consider whether there was perhaps an underlying issue behind the regulations and the logic around that issue could apply regardless of manmade border lines.
679.
by natch 3y ago
Airship-sized containers of the most easily leaked inflammable substance known to man, hovering near sparking power lines, what could possibly go wrong?
680.
by natch 3y ago
Can you reasonably make the (only needs to be verbal) argument that you are considering maybe going to graduate school? If so, national labs in the US hire “graduate research assistants” who don’t get paid much but hey you’ll be working at
681.
by natch 3y ago
Obvious? Maybe ICE driver guilt, but I have never heard a reason that made sense except for some vague accusations that too much fun is being had and that is somehow offensive. And yeah he’s made some mistakes which I guess is unforgivable
682.
by natch 3y ago
Unfortunately that also meant even old malware would run on newer versions.
683.
by natch 3y ago
Apple is definitely not your friend if you refuse to get on board with prioritizing user privacy and security, just to put a reason behind it.
684.
by natch 3y ago
Author thinks that keeping up with security updates adds no business value. Got it.
685.
by natch 3y ago
Yes sounds like a reasonable explanation, thanks.
686.
by natch 3y ago
The WHO spokesperson was not a PRC national.
687.
by natch 3y ago
I see this view a lot from people who have opted to refrain from gathering facts for themselves. Speaking from actual observation there is plenty of countering and debate happening on that platform. And we can see a healthy cohort of anti-T
688.
by natch 3y ago
Yes if there has been a platform where his views could have been freely countered, like Elon’s Twitter / X, that would have been great and probably would have nipped him in the bud. So your fears are exactly backward. It’s the suppress
689.
by natch 3y ago
The WHO spokesperson not being allowed to utter the word Taiwan is an interesting case that I think was instrumental in making a lot of hairs on a lot of necks stand up at the beginning of COVID, alerting people with good demagoguery radar
690.
by natch 3y ago
Stalking and personal endangerment, I think there’s a platform rule for that, which seems fine. What else you got?

More ›