natch

25 ms·

361.
by natch 3y ago
No, this is a common fallacy. You can tell ChatGPT, one of the most infamously hobbled GPTs, in custom instructions that you do want profanity, and it will oblige. This is not a jailbreak, this is supported behavior.
362.
by natch 3y ago
Super odd message since the stack v2 seems to be exclusively code and The Pile is (mostly?) text.
363.
by natch 3y ago
Apple can deal with those as they are uncovered. With alternative approaches, they can’t. So your point defeats itself.
364.
by natch 3y ago
Maybe it sounds great sitting in a modest house in Omaha, but they won’t get far without a charging network.
365.
by natch 3y ago
So, does this mean he’s setting up a third run-in with that same Delaware judge?
366.
by natch 3y ago
Apart from the fact that they are different things, since they came out of the same organization I think it’s fair to ask: Do these models have the same kind of odd behavior as Gemini?
367.
by natch 3y ago
Google is culpable here. But the actual people who work there seem to not care, or are gleefully unaware. But the publishers who sold out to the algorithm are also to blame. I don’t know how to break the vicious cycle here.
368.
by natch 3y ago
This super low quality, low effort, non-original content does not belong on hacker news imho much less the top of the front page. I’ll take my downvotes.
369.
by natch 3y ago
But Apple can take those apps out of the App Store.
370.
by natch 3y ago
Both can be true. Google pays as much for zero days, and Google prioritizes security and privacy less than Apple does. Google's very means of income relies on gathering and to an extent sharing your personal data.
371.
by natch 3y ago
Sure you can but Apple has at least a prayer and a hope of catching those apps in App review to protect users. And if they don't, they have at least a chance of circling back and catching them later. They want that. With apps that they
372.
by natch 3y ago
Advocating for security and user privacy protection.
373.
by natch 3y ago
So, as an abusive stepparent, you run the "Spy on Me" PWA on your stepdaughter's phone, and click the permission dialog, and she's none the wiser. Do you think that's great? Apple does not.
374.
by natch 3y ago
Android "handles it" if you want to call shrugging it off "handling it," by making different security tradeoffs that do not emphasize security as much as Apple does.
375.
by natch 3y ago
“grand cancellation acknowledgements” I love it. These sound grand.
376.
by natch 3y ago
Thanks for clarifying.
377.
by natch 3y ago
You aren’t telling us how it was offered. Openly in front of multiple people, discretely, etc.
378.
by natch 3y ago
It’s not warning lights. If you’re getting that wording from NHTSA, they have their heads up their asses.
379.
by natch 3y ago
Typical low quality journalism. It’s not warning lights, it’s a graphic asset (akin to a CSS sprite if you know web development) and the government wants a few pixels tweaked in an over the air software update to make some icons into i18n-u
380.
by natch 3y ago
Acupuncture versus western medicine, we saw how that worked out for Steve Jobs. Were his western medicine doctors who he pushed off until it was too late, extremists in your book? I wonder if anyone has done a study about why some people ju
381.
by natch 3y ago
Have I entered bizarro world here? Did we even read the same article? Far from being pro-Musk (Musk wasn't even mentioned), the only mention of Tesla in the article is a highly misleading mischaracterization of events. And the non-Tesl
382.
by natch 3y ago
Thanks!
383.
by natch 3y ago
So say a scripted reboot, like in a cron job, is that what you're talking about? Automatable is important. I suppose the script would have to run as root or with suid root? And thanks for the reply.
384.
by natch 3y ago
Yes it steers larger app publishers away from utilizing other app stores, which in turn makes those other app stores less enticing, making it harder for other app stores to survive. The app publishers don't have to choose this new pric
385.
by natch 3y ago
But is there an automatable workaround? Even a 'no' to this question would be a useful addition to this article.
386.
by natch 3y ago
What are those.
387.
by natch 3y ago
For starters, don't believe everything you read. The title is blatantly wrong.
388.
Tell HN: Looking for customer-hair-is-on-fire ideas? Here is one: AI CPA
4 points by natch 3y ago|0 comments
389.
by natch 3y ago
It doesn’t completely protect them, as Apple repeatedly states in the document. It simply can’t protect users as much as it could prior to the legislation, is their claim. But it helps mitigate some aspects.
390.
by natch 3y ago
I’m not any of those, no. But I agree with their stance on protecting privacy. You critics can’t stop thinking it’s only about money. But it’s not.

More ›