Have I entered bizarro world here? Did we even read the same article? Far from being pro-Musk (Musk wasn't even mentioned), the only mention of Tesla in the a

Have I entered bizarro world here? Did we even read the same article? Far from being pro-Musk (Musk wasn't even mentioned), the only mention of Tesla in the article is a highly misleading mischaracterization of events. And the non-Tesla EV makers absolutely deserve shade. Your definition of a pro-Musk article is one that doesn't try to eviscerate or even mention him, and even slights his company? Super odd.