naringas

45 ms·

481.
by naringas 8y ago
reflect that on how that is a privelge for a lucky few. practice feeling grateful about it. or go on a party binge so your job becomes harder to do, more challenging due to tiredness.
482.
by naringas 8y ago
>We go back to a world where connections and your parents determine how far you can go? go back? I don't believe we ever left such a world behind. but this probably varies across different cultures.
483.
by naringas 8y ago
thus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannelloni are sushi and real mexican tacos are too
484.
by naringas 8y ago
> the very wealthy tend to lose the most. probably true but only because they have the most to lose
485.
by naringas 8y ago
I suppose the tricky thing about advocating a balanced message in this specific topic is that nobody really knows what a good working equilibrium should be regarding these issues. I mean, it's a contentious issue for China and the USA.
486.
by naringas 8y ago
I agree... I really advocate for an equilibrium between property and liberty. But throurough my short life on earth I've perceived a stronger pull towards property which (again, seeking equlibrium) makes me use a more extreme language
487.
by naringas 8y ago
I am more interested in being free than having an economy. then again, I speak as a human being, not as a profit motivated institution.
488.
by naringas 8y ago
because it's a slippery slope that seems to constantly slide away from liberty and towards property for most of civilization's history. there's gotta be some equilibrium, which is precisely why copyright was originally intend
489.
by naringas 8y ago
digital property should not work under exclusive principles (unlike physical property which has to). to force exclusionary constrains upon digital property means we choose to abandon one of the key advantages of digital information. it mean
490.
by naringas 8y ago
so with a lot of these flying about we can use ozone-depleting substances (ODS and CFCs) once again?
491.
by naringas 8y ago
> Extreme opinions are rarely correct. this is the only thing I agree with. some things should never be kept propietary unless there are widely availabe (FOSS) tools to reverse engineer them.
492.
by naringas 8y ago
[deleted due to irrelevance]
493.
by naringas 8y ago
your assesment is pretty imprecise. AMLO has got nothing to do with this, he isn't even in office yet (though it kinda seems like he already is). this is really just a proposed law from a state legislature.
494.
by naringas 8y ago
If I knew anything about stock markets, I'd argue that it is a good time to invest in micro $oft; however I have never had enough money to even bother learning about that kind of thing.
495.
by naringas 8y ago
I used to think that google today is like microsoft back in the late 90s and early 00s but your comment makes me think it might be even worse.
496.
by naringas 8y ago
the simulated thickness scaling is not quite right
497.
by naringas 8y ago
I have kept thinking about this.... way over 12k years ago, the anonaki (made up name but ...heheh) did exactly this to early hominids. but it wasn't a breathing device, it was an hability to imagine whatever they (anonaki) proyected,
498.
by naringas 8y ago
i'm underwhelmed 77777777777777 +0 +0 =77777777777777
499.
by naringas 8y ago
sci-fi story scenario: they install it in babies and never really tell them about what it is and does. edit: obviously a sleeker version directly integrated into the body.
500.
by naringas 8y ago
no it doesn't
501.
by naringas 8y ago
pretty good, this has motivated me to do an online post about my own take at similar issues. However I do not assume 12-tet, just the ocatave, so it's slightly different.
502.
by naringas 8y ago
>That's an unrealistic forward standard as society is now. I agree that it is, and in my opinion that's really terrible. > There's more money to be made eroding your ownership of your own thoughts... and what about real
503.
by naringas 8y ago
If an idea is in my head, nobody else but me should should be able to control this idea. the rights of the owner of the idea should never reach inside my head. going further, if a file is in my personal disk which I physically control, the
504.
by naringas 8y ago
my smartphone already blocks some numbers (but I block every one of them), so... shared block lists? just like in adblocking software
505.
by naringas 9y ago
>“discover material that may be child pornography and we have a legal and moral obligation to turn that material over to law enforcement.” is this true? is there a legal obligation?
506.
by naringas 9y ago
there is (was?) a firefox extension called Tab Wheel Scroll which is broken since WebExtensions The main reason I won't upgrade firefox. https://github.com/mthamil/Tab-Wheel-Scroll/issues/19 edit: there&
507.
by naringas 9y ago
doesn't work on firefox... things like these are why I (half-jokingly) think that google is the new "old microsoft", hahha then again, I'm probably gonna stop using firefox soon after some key extensions (which can'
508.
by naringas 9y ago
> maybe some people need a nanny. children do
509.
by naringas 10y ago
I'm betting on the fact the nintendo switch will be able to browse the web and reproduce music and video (youtube, netflix). I understand that they didn't officially support this at launch probably because of time constraints and
510.
by naringas 10y ago
doen not seem to be open source

More ›