5 ms·
i'm underwhelmed 77777777777777 +0 +0 =77777777777777
by naringas 8y ago
i'm underwhelmed
77777777777777
+0
+0
=77777777777777
- jaxtellerSoA 8y agoyeah....I don't see why this such an "impressive" trick.
- ballenf 8y agoThe impressive thing is actually the underlying proof. 40+ pages with lots of edge cases and algorithms for every scenario of any arbitrarily large number.
- dsjoerg 8y agoOK tough guy, please give me three palindromic numbers that add up to 1,234,567. And don't use the trick! And don't use brute force!
- madcaptenor 8y ago1234321 + 242 + 4
- jaxtellerSoA 8y ago1,234,567 + 0 + 0 = 1,234,567
- JadeNB 8y ago> > OK tough guy, please give me three palindromic numbers that add up to 1,234,567. And don't use the trick! And don't use brute force! > 1,234,567 + 0 + 0 = 1,234,567 The first of these is not a palindrome.
- CydeWeys 8y agoI got 10,067,892,461 = 9,910,110,199 + 144,959,441 + 12,822,821, which I think is pretty impressive.
- neogodless 8y agoAh that is neat. For most smaller numbers, it seems to use 0 a lot, which is not interesting. But your example is the first one I saw that didn't include 0.
- CydeWeys 8y agoIt uses 0 a lot because you're giving it such easy numbers that it only needs to solve them as the sum of two palindromes.
- jack6e 8y agoTry 2165749873212654987321354.