4 ms·
because it's a slippery slope that seems to constantly slide away from liberty and towards property for most of civilization's history. there's gotta be some e
by naringas 8y ago
because it's a slippery slope that seems to constantly slide away from liberty and towards property for most of civilization's history.
there's gotta be some equilibrium, which is precisely why copyright was originally intended to be a temporary thing.
- cestith 8y agoTemporary, yes, and it should also have certain exceptions. Exceptions should include things like reverse engineering for making compatible accessories or compatible competitive products. They should include fair use for critique and criticism. They should include the right to resell your property and to repair or customize your own copy of a property. There are probably valid and important exceptions I'm not listing. During that limited term and subject to those exceptions though copyright should be solidly enforced. Otherwise the people creating things will just be ripped off wholesale by people who do nothing but rip them off and relabel things. Now, I think the copyright term is far too long. It is especially too long for abandoned works. I'd like to see something akin to trademark rules applied to copyright, in which if you're not offering a work or a work directly derived from it for X years the term ends early. The maximum term should be a bit shorter than it is for the specific work, too, but I think suing people for copying or modifying something you are no longer willing to sell them is asinine.