nameismypw

5 ms·

1.
by nameismypw 7y ago
No, an externality is an impact you create that isn't a part of your business model. It can be positive or negative. Most of the time people talk about negative externalities these days, especially with airlines, they're talking
2.
by nameismypw 7y ago
That might be what's called a "you problem."
3.
by nameismypw 7y ago
This is a very privileged and perhaps even ignorant view to take. Not everybody has the luxury of waiting for a peaceful revolution to happen.
4.
by nameismypw 7y ago
No, it sounded misogynistic.
5.
by nameismypw 7y ago
This post is a good example of why SEO is such a joke. Worse than a joke, actually, because it's actively harmful. If your search algorithm is penalizing Examine.com, that's a bug in your algorithm. It's not up to websites
6.
by nameismypw 7y ago
How well is that turning out? You can't rely on people to get it right 100% of the time. I definitely wouldn't.
7.
by nameismypw 7y ago
I agree with you! Protesters in North Koreans and Hong Kongers, too. Nobody needs to help them break the law, they should just build their own infrastructure.
8.
by nameismypw 7y ago
> The lawsuit accuses Google of violating the First Amendment, among other offenses, and Gabbard is seeking $50 million plus assurances that Google will refrain from “censoring or restricting” the account. Isn't it common rhetoric t
9.
by nameismypw 7y ago
Hegemony isn't a good reason.
10.
by nameismypw 7y ago
Developers who respect their work, for one.
11.
by nameismypw 7y ago
Do you think that might be why big tech is ruining the world, and do you see yourself as a contributor to that?
12.
by nameismypw 7y ago
Quillette is strongly associated with "the intellectual dark web," which is associated with the alt-right. Quillette publishes prominent alt-right individuals. Several articles on the front page, including the one you mention, f
13.
by nameismypw 7y ago
It doesn't seem appropriate to discuss a Quillette article without mentioning that it's an alt-right publication. We must not normalize it, and I strongly encourage people to flag the submission. A preliminary search will turn up
14.
by nameismypw 7y ago
There's a companion project to Tor called obs4proxy which is designed to hide the protocol's implementation.
15.
by nameismypw 7y ago
1. Controlling the exit nodes doesn't mean anything unless they can use it to perform correlation attacks (because TLS, GPG, etc. Exit nodes are considered malicious regardless of who owns them.) 2. Using hidden services obviates the
16.
by nameismypw 7y ago
> Who does? It's not like most of us have any say in the matter. Anybody who listens to podcasts has a say in the matter. Boycott Apple, Spotify, etc.
17.
by nameismypw 7y ago
Yes, and Anchor. Podcasts are on the way out, just like the open Web. It's unfortunate that we refuse to learn from history.
18.
by nameismypw 7y ago
Hurd is part of the GNU system; it's the intended kernel for the GNU userspace. Linux has been used as an intermediary because Hurd isn't ready for widespread use. But the idea has always been that Hurd would replace Linux and c
19.
by nameismypw 7y ago
The ads
20.
by nameismypw 7y ago
Instead of using a whole new package manager, couldn't people just use IPFS through npm?
21.
by nameismypw 7y ago
> Don't want to be under the jurisdiction of US agencies? Don't do business in the US. The Internet is not "business in the US," hence GP's comment. Am I "doing business in the US" by posting this comm
22.
by nameismypw 7y ago
How are you going to rehash them without having the cleartext password? Hash the SHA1s to bcrypt and then check every password's bcrypt and SHA1*bcrypt's password from then on?