nagasaki45

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by nagasaki45 10y ago

   One of the problems I see with stars on github is the extreme hype around new JS frameworks, which is especially noticable in GitTrends. These projects are indeed trendy, but when you try to choose a tool / technology stars become prob
2. 2.▲
   by nagasaki45 10y ago

   Thank you back for the positive feedback! Someone already reported that commercially-funded projects get high in the list ( https://github.com/Nagasaki45/krihelinator/issues/100 ). I'll need to think what
3. 3.▲
   by nagasaki45 10y ago

   Wow! this is realy nice. The languages list looks quite similar to the one on the Krihelinator ( http://www.krihelinator.xyz/languages ), which is encouraging for both projects, I believe :-)
4. 4.▲
   by nagasaki45 10y ago

   It's a bug :-) Already reported ( https://github.com/Nagasaki45/krihelinator/issues/99 ) and will be handled soon.
5. 5.▲
   by nagasaki45 10y ago

   The way contribution rate is calculated is documented in the about page ( http://www.krihelinator.xyz/about ). I hope that it answers your question. In general, it seems that just from reading the term "contribution rate
6. 6.▲
   by nagasaki45 10y ago

   That sounds horrible! It's definitely not me
7. 7.▲
   by nagasaki45 10y ago

   I agree, that's why the number of contributors in the last week have the most weight in the metric. See the about page ( http://krihelinator.xyz/about ) for more details.
8. 8.▲
   Show HN: GitHub trending alternative that ranks repos by contribution rate(krihelinator.xyz)

   142 points by nagasaki45 10y ago|35 comments