mym1990

40 ms·

241.
by mym1990 3y ago
The point is that there is an information imbalance, which enables one side to have more power in negotiating. Sure I can say "give me more money" but if the employer presumes I have little information on my co-workers, they can j
242.
by mym1990 3y ago
I thought(maybe ignorantly) that a lot of merchants didn’t like Amex because it was so easy for customers to dispute transactions.
243.
by mym1990 3y ago
What is more intense than nobody taking cash, punishment for even having it?
244.
by mym1990 3y ago
They definitely didn't say 'what if' but 'what would it take'. Which would be a massive subsidy or investment to get enough runway to get a plane out and see if it can compete. As far as examples of 100 billion doll
245.
by mym1990 3y ago
That’s the one. The MCAS incidents were very clearly faulty processes and software and to have two catastrophic incidents have to happen to get to the cause is tragic. Currently people are latching onto every tidbit that goes wrong on or ar
246.
by mym1990 3y ago
I meant a brand new builder…Lockheed Martin is obviously not a newcomer to making airplanes.
247.
by mym1990 3y ago
I was referencing the United flight last week that landed in Houston and ran off the taxiway into the grass, you complete twat. That's actually a disgusting statement by you.
248.
by mym1990 3y ago
I was referencing the United flight last week that landed in Houston and ran off the taxiway into the grass. Nice of you to show your colors though.
249.
by mym1990 3y ago
Weren't they doing this and then got pushed out by Boeing? It seems like the business of making airplanes has an incredibly high cost of entry, tons of regulation, and fairly thin margins. One incident would be all it takes to shut a n
250.
by mym1990 3y ago
I would second this. I believe people are bunching a lot of things together: pilot error, maintenance issues, airplane defects into one big "BOEING SUCKS" billboard.
251.
by mym1990 3y ago
I mean I kind of felt like the website is unique, classy, and likely speaks to a part of the author's character.
252.
by mym1990 3y ago
What makes you think this isn't at least partially AI generated content?
253.
by mym1990 3y ago
My point is more that: the engines are built by a different company, the tickets are sold by different companies, the airports are run by different companies. I am not making a distinction between large aircraft and medium aircraft, I am sa
254.
by mym1990 3y ago
Isn't that the beauty of magic, and of much technology...that to the end viewer it just works ? How does a magician get the oohs and ahhs by revealing their secrets? Much of the world spending time on the web actually doesn't ca
255.
by mym1990 3y ago
I don't think defining the size of a market based on how many companies are in it is a very useful metric. If you kept reading your investopedia snippet, you would see that "The airplane manufacturing market is part of the overall
256.
by mym1990 3y ago
You seem to be really dumbing down AGI, considering AGI will likely do everything a human can do, as well as many things a human cannot do, and all of those things will be done vastly faster and better.
257.
by mym1990 3y ago
The "goal" of AGI seems to be a pretty subjective thing, doesn't it? Idealistically, I could believe that the goal of AGI is to help humans build the future faster, and expand our footprint beyond what we currently believe is
258.
by mym1990 3y ago
Totally agree, but the truth is that it is hard to say that the public has lost trust in Boeing when more people than ever are in the air. The peanut gallery is on to something, and Boeing is losing orders, but it doesn't seem to be en
259.
by mym1990 3y ago
A lot of safety related improvements(at least in the US) are also due to the FAA and generally the open process of anonymously reporting issues on flights. Each crash has also been meticulously investigated and vast improvements were put in
260.
by mym1990 3y ago
How do you suppose a half a trillion dollar market is not a "huge industry"? I am definitely aware of the cultural issues at Boeing, but boiling it down to "sometimes things are simple" is just a lot of ignorance on your
261.
by mym1990 3y ago
I would lean towards an anti-Boeing hype cycle with some confluence of a series of unfortunate events. This is not to say that the QA issues aren't leading to something catastrophic, but on the whole I don't think people quite com
262.
by mym1990 3y ago
How is this any different than the industrial revolution ushering in a new age, or for that matter any technology that creates huge efficiencies in labor? The truth is that the future is still very uncertain, and while the easiest thing to
263.
by mym1990 3y ago
This is likely only because the initial candidate was already thrown out of the pool, so the 15 day later candidate might as well become first in line at that point.
264.
by mym1990 3y ago
But the candidate usually never knows what position they are in line. Sure the person on the other side of the table could divulge, but the candidate shouldn't really trust that information. A person that is aware enough to know they a
265.
by mym1990 3y ago
Or: people who are hiring their future co-workers sort for people who will not make their life hell(or their co-workers life hell), and then evaluate for actual expertise.
266.
by mym1990 3y ago
Huberman is sponsored by AG1, thereby he endorses the product.
267.
by mym1990 3y ago
Very cool. A while ago I took a trip down memory lane with my partner to take a look at the first messages we sent each other, it was very neat and the memories definitely came back, even though it has been years since we met! A little bit
268.
by mym1990 3y ago
I was in a bootcamp in 2014 and this was still a problem, albeit not with AI, but with the lack of useful material. We were learning very high level concepts about the "flavor of the month framework" rather than any coding fundame
269.
by mym1990 3y ago
Right, my mistake, the definition of supernatural I would like to take is actually referring to the strength of the material, and not the material itself. In my original comment I made a reference to both of those things, but side by side t
270.
by mym1990 3y ago
I do not see myself doing that in a conversation, on a scale of 0-100 my involvement in material science is 0, however I could see a scientist somewhere having that conversation.

More ›