muwtyhg

8 ms·

91.
by muwtyhg 9mo ago
Female is a word that can refer to any species. Woman is a human female. The use of "female" is often used to dehumanize the subject, and is almost never used consistently. I am guessing you do not, off the cuff, refer to men as
92.
by muwtyhg 9mo ago
Oh, I get it. He is trigger happy, but it's because he was provoked by the deadly weapon!
93.
by muwtyhg 9mo ago
So if a cop fires a single shot into a suspects head because the suspect hiccuped, is the cop not being "trigger happy" because he didn't magdump?
94.
by muwtyhg 9mo ago
Taking your framing at face value (I disagree that the videos show this, but lets assume they do). Does shooting someone who is operating a vehicle aimed at you "end the threat"? What happened after the officer shot the driver? Di
95.
by muwtyhg 9mo ago
You mean the woman who was driving the car? I think we do take away the license of people shown unfit to drive, or with conditions that may cause their driving to hurt others (conditions that cause sudden loss of consciousness, confusion,
96.
by muwtyhg 9mo ago
These numbers look pretty similar to Trump's voter base in 2024. He got 49% of the vote from the 60% of the population that can vote, so about 30% of all possible votes.
97.
by muwtyhg 9mo ago
> Edit: I'm not talking about deepfakes of real people Then you are not talking about the article, so what was the point of your comment?
98.
by muwtyhg 9mo ago
> why you think its eerie? You typed out how awful the situation is, and how you cannot trust anything, and then ask why it's eerie? I feel like you answered your own question before you even asked it.
99.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
This sounds like saying "Everything that human beings do is good, because if it wasn't, they wouldn't continue to do it!"
100.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
He listed those because they have kernel-level anti-cheat or DRM system that requires Windows/MacOS to run. You cannot WINE them. > but they often don't work right under Windows either. This is certainly untrue. Them working of
101.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
Could you be more specific in your criticism? As an observer of the conversation, I see the OP making a bunch of substantiated claims/observations and your response is "that's cherry-picked or misleading" but you never r
102.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
Ctrl-Z will un-move that file or folder,.
103.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
> Want to change the law? Do it correctly. This is incredibly rich coming from the person defending Trump, the man who is ruling almost exclusively via executive order. > The troops were there to protect Federal Law Enforcement and Fe
104.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
Does this article actually expect the reader to download two random APK files and then install them on their Shield? This seems... dangerous?
105.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
What about after, when he explained it away by making "I did not 'Nazi' that coming" jokes on Twitter?
106.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
How about this: we are living in the build-up to Idiocracy. The period that came before Not Sure showed up, when Brawndo was convincing the government to water crops with Brawndo.
107.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
> What I meant that it was infantile and immature Unlike your very sarcastic, passive-aggressive response? The observation they are making is real. An article about how identity politics is bad shouldn't be engaging in that exact ta
108.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
> How is following the law How many legal court orders have been ignored during this case? If a court is asking for his release, then it's "following the law" and not political, right? Why do you get to choose what part is
109.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
This feels like an oversimplification of the issue. Why moderate at all? Spam posted here would only require you to "have to scroll sometimes".
110.
by muwtyhg 10mo ago
So those folks must be doing it because they think it's helpful, right? They are explicitly trying not to take credit for the words. Do you think, after a ban of these kinds of posts are implemented, that those posters would start hi
111.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
No, you also claimed Snopes edited an article about masks, and claimed something about the contents it was edit from and to: > My favorite was their check on masks in early 2020 - they said that masks do nothing to the airborne viruses a
112.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
>> I was just trying to understand what parts of this admin you lean towards, and if this is one of those cases. >Why? Because I can't square your previous statements without understanding what parts are acceptable to you and
113.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
"Anyone involved in harming the country" is easy to say. It's much harder to know what "harming the country" means in this context. One persons censorship is another persons fact checking. If the government is going
114.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
> Did someone write a blogpost/tweet/reddit post/take a screenshot of it at the time? For a claim you are making, you seem to not be able to find a single piece of evidence. How did you ever find out there was an original
115.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
There are other options besides those. You have two pieces of information: If you trust experts or "do your own research" and if you are correct or not. This leads to four choices: - You trust experts, and the experts are right -&
116.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
> Sure, and that woman could surely have come up with some bible verses or something. But would they even bother, if we accept them as an authority? In a modern, secular society, we do not take "the bible" as a logical reason f
117.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
> Preparation is not the same as worry. Worry solves nothing Would you prepare for something you did not have any worries about? I assume any preparation would be in response to a worry/fear/uncertainty about a situation. You s
118.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
> First - there's no point in worrying about something before it's clear what will happen You don't think it's important to prepare for things that have a non-zero likelihood of occurring? This case has already worked
119.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
Surely in these situations, the fact-checked information is more knowable than God. The fact checker can provide other sources that may support their position. The woman with a hotline to God cannot possibly provide any proof of her claims.
120.
by muwtyhg 11mo ago
Assumedly you need an email hosting service to place behind your domain, correct? Or do you self host an email server? If you are completely self-hosting, how do you deal with being marked as spam by large spam filter organizations for bein

More ›