"Anyone involved in harming the country" is easy to say. It's much harder to know what "harming the country" means in this context. One persons censorship is an

"Anyone involved in harming the country" is easy to say. It's much harder to know what "harming the country" means in this context. One persons censorship is another persons fact checking. If the government is going after anyone "censoring free speech", they can pick and choose who to apply that to because there is no clear definition of a civilian censoring another civilian (because legally this does not exist).