Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
muwtyhg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
121.
▲
by
muwtyhg
11mo ago
Privacy is not a culture war issue. Not wanting massive amounts of personal data hoovered up to train an AI for Google is reasonable. Arguing against this kind of invasion of privacy is not "dumb propaganda".
122.
▲
by
muwtyhg
11mo ago
Surely the fact that there is a comment section on user submitted media means this website is social media?
123.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
> especially given that there’s no indication on wikipedia of contested facts Have you ever been to a Wikipedia Talk Page? Basically every page you can find will have some people arguing about what should be placed on the page on the Tal
124.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
What are you basing that on?
125.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
> Showing it to more people The people obsessed with Trump do not watch any Democratic press conferences or media. They will not see it, and everyone watching already disagrees with what is happening. They would just be preaching to the
126.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
> That some females can be stronger than some men If you are using "female" as a noun in a sentence to refer to human women, it is a good idea to also refer to human men as "male". It is more consistent and doesn'
127.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
This won't matter when all of your neighbors have a Ring doorbell, you will still be recorded every time you leave your house. You are just making yourself more noticeable and disagreeable to the surveillance apparatus.
128.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
Please, just list one or two things you actually support. You are being so evasive on actually backing up what you support of Trump.
129.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
You have been asked this exact question multiple times on this post and you have not answered a single time.
130.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
> Without a doubt, Democrats have denied visas. You provided zero evidence that Democrats have denied visas based on social media posts. You just mentioned the number of border crossings in 2021 to 2025. What point are you trying to make
131.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
It's an unfortunate situation where they will be ostracized for lack of participation in social media like Snapchat or TikTok. Children ostracizing those who don't fit in has been a thing forever, but has been thrown into overdriv
132.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
That's where the network of CCTV cameras with facial recognition and gait detection come in! Barreling towards a complete lack of privacy is scary and waving it away as "just don't bring your phone" is massively naive. T
133.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
Yeah, just live in a cave in the middle of nowhere. A sure-fire solution for everyone! You expect SO MUCH diligence from individuals while removing any responsibility for the situation from the companies perpetrating it. I now have to make
134.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
That's clever. I didn't even think of that. I wonder if the "'A' Wife" is also a pun/play on words?
135.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
Yes, it does.
136.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
> This was not a immigration operation where agents went into the premises, rounded up folks, and put them on buses This quote implies that there are immigration operations where people do these things, and that this particular instance
137.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
I think this option is being phased out, it seems increasingly hard to ever find a way to talk to a real human on most corporate IVR systems. I've cursed and threatened many AI-based IVR systems and most of the time, the AI would just
138.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
> they mean illegal aliens are being detained to be deported to their home countries Are you sure about this? Didn't the Supreme Court recently decide these people can be sent to a third-party nation? [1] > When people used to sa
139.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
I think they are implying your original post was written by an LLM. Why use em-dashes instead of regular hyphens?
140.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
Thank you for this. I was pretty sure most people in this thread had the duct/duck origin incorrect, and this reminded me of why I thought that. Looking at the Duct Tape wiki, it says: > During World War II, Revolite (then a divisio
141.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
> Since they don't really care about Jews except as a means to end everything and meet Jesus, does that count as "Zionism"? Yes. More specifically: Christian Zionism [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chri
142.
▲
by
muwtyhg
1y ago
The character is actually named Clippit. Although maybe MS trademarked Clippy after it became the more common name.
143.
▲
by
muwtyhg
2y ago
> - Reusable bags have to be reused dozens of times to make up for the additional environmental impact, so damage likely went up Damage to what? The bags? The food? The environment? I don't understand why bags built to be re-used is
144.
▲
by
muwtyhg
2y ago
> We had banners and bullshit galore. The problem now is not the visible aspect of advertising on the internet. It's the obsessive tracking and categorization of people to make advertising more effective that I'm upset with. Th
145.
▲
by
muwtyhg
2y ago
The article says these 6 "tips" are data-driven, yet provides no source or information on why or how the tips actually work. Just that fitness tracker Reddit users "tend to converge on the same set of lifestyle recommendation
146.
▲
by
muwtyhg
2y ago
Another former Tree Style Tabs user, now on Sideberry with no regrets. I am excited that FireFox is working this in by default so I don't have to keep fiddling with userChrome.css to get rid of the top tab bar.
147.
▲
by
muwtyhg
2y ago
I think they're arguing that encryption done by someone else on your behalf is not actually in your control. And if the people who do control it are beholden to the government requests, then they are not a safe option either. I'm
148.
▲
by
muwtyhg
2y ago
"Give" is a strong word for a company whose main product is surveilling their customers to show them ads. I'm not sure how much you can avoid "giving" Google your personal information at this point without deep know
149.
▲
by
muwtyhg
2y ago
The article says this is an estimate based on an "about 10%" figure: > Implied was that they would be doing this without the help of an undisclosed number of newly former employees. That number has been guesstimated at around t
150.
▲
by
muwtyhg
3y ago
It seems like you and the GP didn't read even the first 20% of the article. The author shows their CGM in the first 2 page lengths. They mentioned they did all of this because the official Libre app was constantly losing connection wit
More ›