muro

61 ms·

721.
by muro 13y ago
> we know that the NSA has even installed hardware at companies like Google where did you find that? I thought all the big companies say they don't have anything installed by NSA, but that NSA can ask for data
722.
by muro 13y ago
> since we know that the NSA has even installed hardware at companies like Google you do? I never heard of such thing - can you tell more?
723.
by muro 14y ago
You can pay for gmail and have no ads: http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=6...
724.
by muro 14y ago
Active sync has licensing costs to Microsoft. And Microsoft complains that Google doesn't want to pay them except for business users.
725.
by muro 14y ago
citation needed edit: Don't they all follow what they say in their TOS? Are the TOS the same? (I don't know, maybe they are)
726.
by muro 14y ago
I agree when comparing atom to a core, but I can't tell the difference between a i5 and a i7.
727.
by muro 14y ago
I agree on some points - getting a bad screen or keyboard will make using the machine painful - get good ones. Investing into a faster CPU or GPU is a complete waste of money. Most of the cheap machines try to give you a fast CPU while skip
728.
by muro 14y ago
scary story. Reminded me of this kid's story (almost same age): http://overheadbin.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/07/25/12945121-rom...
729.
by muro 14y ago
Even worse, it's 4 years for GPUs.
730.
by muro 14y ago
Isn't that what the Google+ app on android does?
731.
by muro 15y ago
I think in some european countries the regulation says the doors must always open in the direction towards the exit. So in this case it would open outwards.
732.
by muro 15y ago
I'd love that. I hope my next computer is my phone. Even better if it can run starcraft 2 :)
733.
by muro 15y ago
apparently the text. I found the review be very good: * switching apps looses context/state and is slow * pdf readers suck * some keyboard shortcuts seem to be impossible, making emacs painful I for one found it surprising
734.
by muro 15y ago
I never seen any value from parked domains. People only get there by mistake.
735.
by muro 15y ago
which game did you try to recreate?
736.
by muro 15y ago
that says they didn't copy results by looking at google directly, but by watching users that use google. With the number of IE users, the difference is only in how they achieved it, not whether they did it.
737.
by muro 15y ago
Can anyone really think that a phone that sells for more than 500 without subsidy can be sold for 99 with ads making up for the difference?
738.
by muro 15y ago
> What no one knew at the time, and I only heard months later, was Google’s original vision for the Nexus One. Google intended to sell it for $99 without a contract and unlocked. Yes, a $99 unlocked phone, subsidized by Google ads. haha
739.
by muro 15y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Stewart#Stock_trading_ca...
740.
by muro 15y ago
sorry - removed my previous comment in the meantime. It was obvious it's a joke, so I figured my comment is just noise. And now I can replace it with even more words :)
741.
by muro 15y ago
> Google+ being released over a year late to Google App users I don't think Google+ launched a year ago.
742.
by muro 15y ago
the built-in browser is also getting better with every release.
743.
by muro 15y ago
The dolphin browser web page doesn't even say who creates it. Would you really trust it with your passwords and browsing history?
744.
by muro 15y ago
amazing, especially some places like Vienna or New York.
745.
by muro 15y ago
+ there should be the same for laws.
746.
by muro 16y ago
is there a source for the claim?
747.
by muro 16y ago
same troll as before.
748.
by muro 16y ago
yep. same troll
749.
by muro 16y ago
From the article (about spell correction): > Well, above is the same situation where Bing gets a misspelled word right — a link to a definition of the correctly spelled word at the top of the list. But it’s very unlikely it figured this
750.
by muro 16y ago
While we have no idea why this result is good, Google seems to think it's fine. If it's good enough for google, it's good enough for us.

More ›