multjoy

8 ms·

91.
by multjoy 1y ago
Lol, if you like. Individually, the people of the UK are generally kind, thoughtful and considerate. As a mob, they're an absolute nightmare especially when wankers like Fox and Corbyn get involved. Anyone who thinks otherwise has neve
92.
by multjoy 1y ago
In matters of public health, you cannot trust the public to do the right thing. The problem with covid is that we weren't totalitarian enough. Regulations you could drive a coach & horses through and no way to enforce is a sop. The
93.
by multjoy 1y ago
Did you somehow sleep through the whole doge debacle?
94.
by multjoy 1y ago
You're the one being obtuse. There has never, in the history of humanity, been a time where a criminal can communicate with other criminals with absolute immunity as they can today.
95.
by multjoy 1y ago
They claimed a trade deficit with islands that are inhabited by penguins and imposed a tariff on said penguins. You are being governed by someone with dementia who has surrounded himself with people who appear unable to say 'no'.
96.
by multjoy 1y ago
I don't understand what people get from using a chatbot to write correspondence. It saves no time, and just ends up being long winded nonsense. My stance is that if you're about to ask co-pilot, or whatever, to respond to me, then
97.
by multjoy 1y ago
You don't need to declare war to have enemies. After all, Russia has launched chemical and radiological attacks on EU states.
98.
by multjoy 1y ago
The difference is they're not an enemy sovereign state. This isn't contradictory or illogical.
99.
by multjoy 1y ago
Do you think allowing an enemy state free reign to broadcast propaganda to your population makes good tactical sense?
100.
by multjoy 1y ago
It’s Teams or Defender, they haven’t built a supercomputer.
101.
by multjoy 1y ago
No it hasn't. Your post was easy to open, your phone easy to tap. The use of surveillance equipment was basically unregulated. You may not have had transaction level monitoring but you certainly had no expectation of privacy at the ban
102.
by multjoy 1y ago
But it's also windows only...
103.
by multjoy 1y ago
It is absolutely not a drop in the bucket. USDT is the money launderer’s dream. If they can get it into crypto (and there are a number of firms who are barely disguised criminal finance portals), the world is very much their oyster.
104.
by multjoy 1y ago
Unless you’re using mixers then it is relatively trivial to follow your BTC around the blockchain. That is the very point of it. The issue of provenance is an issue regardless of the type of funds. In most jurisdictions the burden of proof
105.
by multjoy 1y ago
lol, you absolutely can.
106.
by multjoy 1y ago
>Police have never had at-will access to any personal data and communications they desired. Wiretaps, postal interference. None of it was routine, but the tactic for dealing with serious criminality was still there. >Historically, you
107.
by multjoy 1y ago
> Yes. You are describing actual police work; it is how things have always been. No, it hasn’t. Criminals haven’t always had access to literally uncrackable encryption, both messaging and voice, in a manner that is impossible to attribut
108.
by multjoy 1y ago
Crime statistics are difficult. England & Wales (because policing is a devolved matter in the UK) have very robust crime recording rules. Consequently, the detection rates are low because you record and close crimes where there is liter
109.
by multjoy 1y ago
It doesn't. It just means that they've not gone at a speed sufficiently egregious for a detective to be handed the packet to work out the vehicle's true identity.
110.
by multjoy 1y ago
I’ve seen the standard of driving in the US. This is not the model you are looking for.
111.
by multjoy 1y ago
Why? Who are you to say what I can, and cannot, write?
112.
by multjoy 1y ago
Oh, I entirely agree. It just seems absolutely nuts that the US government (or rather the state governments, because ultimately they'd be dealing with it) cannot attribute a gun to a purchase because they've specifically made it i
113.
by multjoy 1y ago
Yes, but then you'd have to create a database of gun purchases and that would be illegal. https://www.thetrace.org/2016/08/atf-non-searchable-database...
114.
by multjoy 1y ago
OP doesn’t even acknowledge it. Eliot chose, in 1948, when the Holocaust was common knowledge, to reprint a poem that contains the line: >On the Rialto once./The rats are underneath the piles. The jew is underneath the lot. That isn
115.
by multjoy 1y ago
That doesn’t make it any better. They also had significant opposition.
116.
by multjoy 1y ago
He was also a virulent anti-semite
117.
by multjoy 1y ago
They’re not human, they’re not your friend. They’re a spicy autocomplete.
118.
by multjoy 1y ago
The LLM has literally no idea which one is better. It cannot think. It does not understand what it is putting on the screen.
119.
by multjoy 1y ago
In a lot of jurisdictions, the offence isn't drinking while driving, it's having a blood/breath alcohol level above a certain threshold.
120.
by multjoy 1y ago
The payment networks don’t pay for the cost of chargebacks - that’s borne by the merchant or the card issuer, the network makes money either way. This is one of those situations where the optimal level of fraud isn’t zero.

More ›