multjoy

9 ms·

121.
by multjoy 1y ago
That's OK, because nobody's provided anything other than anecdote.
122.
by multjoy 1y ago
How can "which is the larger number" be an ambiguous question?
123.
by multjoy 1y ago
Schadenfreude, obviously. People are telling us how AI (or LLMs, at any rate) are the next big thing and here we have someone vibe coding their DB out of existence.
124.
by multjoy 1y ago
Lots of 'mays' and 'mights', and I've been running long enough, and know plenty of runners, to know that running ruining joints is a myth put about by the exercise avoiders.
125.
by multjoy 1y ago
It does not lead to heart damage and it won’t knacker your joints. It will suck all the time you are doing it, but you physically cannot damage your heart from over exertion.
126.
by multjoy 1y ago
Universal healthcare is a human right.
127.
by multjoy 1y ago
Likely an OCG behind them. I wouldn't be surprised to see a defence of exploitation.
128.
by multjoy 1y ago
They don't work. You may as well use phrenology.
129.
by multjoy 1y ago
You can rely on the answer a calculator gives you. There's no danger that it will simply be confidently wrong.
130.
by multjoy 1y ago
A human didn't write it, I'm not reading it.
131.
by multjoy 1y ago
SteamOS & proton.
132.
by multjoy 1y ago
Days to write a document, but you think that it'll only take 30-60 minutes to review AI slop that may, or may not, bear any relationship to the truth?
133.
by multjoy 1y ago
That wasn't the question. The complaint is the poster can't find anything on Google because the results are now so poor, and your response is "but here's some AI generated slop, which may or may not make any sense."
134.
by multjoy 1y ago
You need reasonable grounds to suspect that someone has committed an offence in order to arrest (plus a necessity). This has been the case since 1984, the necessity was only added because SOCPA got rid of the distinction between arrestabl
135.
by multjoy 1y ago
Kyiv
136.
by multjoy 1y ago
You didn't write it, tell me why I should read it?
137.
by multjoy 1y ago
Lol, no.
138.
by multjoy 1y ago
Because it is either laziness, ignorance or AI slop.
139.
by multjoy 1y ago
Anything that could possibly justify the expense, I suspect, whether it is the right thing or not.
140.
by multjoy 1y ago
“Siri, show me an example of overconfidence”
141.
by multjoy 1y ago
You’ve used an LLM to write that, haven’t you.
142.
by multjoy 1y ago
If you don’t know the answers, how can you judge the machine output?
143.
by multjoy 1y ago
Why would you want to read something that isn’t written by a human?
144.
by multjoy 1y ago
It is not.
145.
by multjoy 1y ago
Conversate is not a word.
146.
by multjoy 1y ago
lol, no
147.
by multjoy 1y ago
The difference between a good salesman and a fraudster is intent. This is weaponised grooming. These scammers don't have code of ethics, they will push whatever emotional button they think will get the result they want. You're con
148.
by multjoy 1y ago
Seeing as you didn't write this, why should we read it?
149.
by multjoy 1y ago
It's massively common. USDT is the usual coin of choice because even though the ledger is public, the convenience and relative stability massively outweighs the security risks. In the jobs I've seen, the marks will be 'invest
150.
by multjoy 1y ago
There are no consequences. The president has immunity and the courts are about to have the option of criminal contempt prosecutions removed. Cletus and his stockpile of ammunition are going to have little or no impact and he will be hunted

More ›