ms_sv

3 ms·

1.
by ms_sv 7mo ago
It is not about overcoming human nature like HR tries to force things like that. > Why wouldn’t I verify any junior that asked me? This tells me that there will be people signing up to do that and earn the benefits of verifying others.
2.
by ms_sv 7mo ago
That is very interesting, it is like a starting filter for candidates which can catch candidates that might not be a fit for the job after all. Basically the candidate was lacking the discipline and patience to be able to handle paperwork a
3.
by ms_sv 7mo ago
Endorsements are good way, but limited and they can be bought and can be faked easily, which does not bring much credibility.Do you think there is a way to improve the endorsement system from LinkedIn into something that will be taken more
4.
by ms_sv 7mo ago
Yes absolutely, I am looking for framework that will be included in the platform to be able to asses someone and determine those accurately skills to have them in the CV it is not easy and it is a challenge, overall those skills can make a
5.
by ms_sv 7mo ago
Thank you for the feedback. It is meant to be all kinds of engineering, the vision is to have all type of engineers from software engineers(which you are correct it is focused full on that). > How would this platform measure real enginee
6.
by ms_sv 7mo ago
This is a real insight "finding the most skilled candidate but rather the most compatible candidate", thank you very much, this is the kind of feedback I am looking for from engineers. I never looked at it from this perspective. I
7.
by ms_sv 7mo ago
Thank you for the feedback, I appriciate it. The idea is to avoid the corruption and bias by hand picking a starter deck of super trusted few professionals who would be able to verify others. For example to prove someone is an senior engine
8.
Peer validation platform for engineering skills (inspired by X community notes)
4 points by ms_sv 7mo ago|16 comments