mrangle

20 ms·

241.
by mrangle 2y ago
>Are you open to the possibility that your particular experience with buses is not what all buses are or must be like? This is also sounds like an underfunded and sparse bus system. You can do buses right or you can do them poorly, same
242.
by mrangle 2y ago
What's silly is to state that we "can't" make things cheaper. The rest of your statements are relative to the myriad costs of no cars and other transportation. It's narrative. >That’s not getting cheap. It’s like
243.
by mrangle 2y ago
Public transportation isn't exactly cheap when used every day. Then factor in your time and frustration. Nothing is as expensive as your time. Cars are amazing at their current cost, comparatively. And as I said, we should work on maki
244.
by mrangle 2y ago
>what’s the use case for this recall thing? Surveillance, very obviously. It'd be reasonable to see this as a waymark on a roadmap. Which is why it makes little sense to users. Why it is counterintuitive in that it will drive people
245.
by mrangle 2y ago
Hardly anyone commenting, let alone policymakers with lifelong privilege and who are career incentivized to stay within a certain perspective, has significant if any experience taking the bus. I took the urban bus to and from school for yea
246.
by mrangle 2y ago
But the discussion is whether or not Russia is bluffing, which is a decision that will be reflected in Western tactics. The discussion is not merely to come up with the scenarios that Russia is likely considering. Possible scenarios are sim
247.
by mrangle 2y ago
Disagree
248.
by mrangle 2y ago
There is no such conscious entity as "the US government". Said entity is a legal vehicle. It can't consciously seek to profit, nor does it care whether or not it profits. However, the point of legal vehicles is to benefit peo
249.
by mrangle 2y ago
It's always correct for any slightly mature system. That's not what I mean, at all.
250.
by mrangle 2y ago
The people who are downvoting my "disagree" are likely assuming that I am speaking philosophically. I'm not. Philosophically, sure: the purpose of the government is to serve the people. A philosophy written specifically for t
251.
by mrangle 2y ago
>If that were so, any country making a nuclear threat (backed by capability) would get their wish granted. Why? I said that capability is the metric. Followed by threats. Neither absolutely defines response. The primary takeaway is to NO
252.
by mrangle 2y ago
>I've tried introducing myself as "I'm a human", you'd think everyone would agree with this label but it gets unenthusiastic reactions. The followup "You're human too, right?" is even worse. > I
253.
by mrangle 2y ago
"Isolation" isn't an on topic response. The only rational take is to believe nations when they say that they will use them, not when they won't. Capability is the only measurement. Active threats are its decoration. We
254.
by mrangle 2y ago
Trained, high functioning people with the same condition are likely the best diagnosticians for that condition. At least for The Spectrum. As they would theoretically be better able to identify malingerers. The other side of the coin is tha
255.
by mrangle 2y ago
A problem with the article is the lack of differentiation, for stated or implied diagnoses, between potentially curable conditions and those that are developmental.
256.
by mrangle 2y ago
Do you not understand the lack of enthusiasm? The logic will end with why its lack is not disagreement. Whereas the opposite is implied in your post.
257.
by mrangle 2y ago
Because people need accommodations, either formal or informal. At its base, the logic is no more complicated. Other reasons for adopting a categorical identity will vary and often be nonexistent.
258.
by mrangle 2y ago
>I don't see how it could be anything else and pass any data-protection regulation >Having said that, I'm very much aware that most implementation of these tools will become a security and surveillance nightmare. The contrad
259.
by mrangle 2y ago
Acknowledging that this is a pedantic correction: I think that there will be an acknowledgement of over diagnosis of ADHD. First line treatments are what they are. But also that, in tandem, there will be acknowledgement of under diagnosis o
260.
by mrangle 2y ago
"Microsoft Recall data will stay local"
261.
by mrangle 2y ago
>Whoever said anything about communism? Whoever said anything about Libertarianism? Only "rich people" and "dupes for libertarianism" "seem to" prefer low taxes? This is seriously how you think you are going
262.
by mrangle 2y ago
Microsoft's chutzpa lays down the ultimate "Trust Me Bro" years past the peak of trust.
263.
by mrangle 2y ago
Only bested by communist propaganda. I'm not a libertarian. I'm also not one to be berated into professing that the opposite of disapproving of ever more taxes is libertarianism nor anything else. The justification for ever more t
264.
by mrangle 2y ago
Hold on: I have to calm my shivering nerves after the intimidating meaningless jargon and threat to evaluate "the science", whether or not you actually have the ability to do so. I'm contending that you putting words in my mo
265.
by mrangle 2y ago
These type of articles are a riot: praising new taxes like they are a boon instead of primarily a political class grift with rare additional benefit to the citizenry. And especially not any that overcomes the economic drag.
266.
by mrangle 2y ago
The PR article praise of Recall will continue until morale improves.
267.
by mrangle 2y ago
>Seems like in most cases the state is more pro-israel than the population. In some cases. But like I said, Western Nations are now factional at a high level (in my observation, and whether or not this is an intentional result - in my vi
268.
by mrangle 2y ago
All true. The difference is mostly that at least Apple's compromises are more predictable and marginally more buttoned up. Apple is marginally qualitatively better than Windows in the categories of privacy and security. With the single
269.
by mrangle 2y ago
It could be up in the air. For perspective, I'm with Israel. Though, I'm for saving as many Palestinian lives as humanly possible. Which should be all of them, should the clerics and State Actors stop abusing them via radicalizati
270.
by mrangle 2y ago
Support / condemnation will be staunchly factionally split from within all Western Nations. Speaking about a National Unified Will is ridiculous at this stage in history. Eventually, the anti-Israel faction will dominate everywhere exc

More ›