Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mpldr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mpldr
2y ago
UKI isn't by redhat but by the Kernel devs, iirc. No redhead certs required. If you want to run with secureboot, you can use your own certs, but you can also just skip SB.
2.
▲
Google Patent on how to show ads in Email clients [pdf]
(patentimages.storage.googleapis.com)
2 points
by
mpldr
2y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
A scalable approach to network reconstruction
(arxiv.org)
2 points
by
mpldr
2y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
Yes, we must lock down everything and make it fully proprietary. Imagine having interoperable systems without vendor lock in!
5.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
> makes you more likely to […] have unprotected sex As someone with ADD, I wish I could agree. Adding to that, ADD can also be reasonably economically productive if the field of work aligns with the requirements of the condition. IT usua
6.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
> Developers could also do these processes. And they probably do, often. But they usually have their heads so far up their asses that they don't see how inscrutable this onboarding process is even for very technical users. I would a
7.
▲
Show HN: LYML – a configuration format with the expressed goal of being readable
(git.sr.ht)
2 points
by
mpldr
3y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
There was a reddit link posted under another thread, which had a very extensive list.
9.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
Since this has generated quite some interest, the reasons I dislike Laravel are: - so. many. godobjects. - I dislike ORMs. I could not put my finger on it, while using PHP frameworks, because they were omni-present; but after using Python,
10.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
Laravel, the framework that made me quit PHP. Not sure the concept of "one framework doing everything" will resonate well with the wider Go community. I will keep an eye on it though.
11.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
The cookie law™ clearly lays out that technically required cookies can be set without explicit consent. Performance measurements are not a requirement though. So if you are not using anything but essential cookies on your site, you don'
12.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
Please, let me know which one!
13.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
At least for me a browser should be an interactive document viewer. Not CAD, not file conversion, not writing OS images to an SD card, not generating GCode. Ingesting HTML, CSS, and JS and turning it into an interactive view of that XML doc
14.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
I would be very different if browsers were tools to view documents though. I am not saying that browsers don't have a purpose. I just question that browsers should answer the question about what their scope is with a loud "yes!&qu
15.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=chromium https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=chrome https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=firefox ht
16.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
Blink is my operating system and Linux is its bootloader.
17.
▲
by
mpldr
3y ago
Question for discussion: when have we reached the point where the Browser Feature-creep is too much and we say "okay, a browser probably doesn't need this"? Because after seeing WebUSB and WebGPU I think my personal limit has
18.
▲
by
mpldr
4y ago
> Risk of being blocked by big players (gmail/O365) is real but IMHO very low if you follow BCP Can confirm, only issue I have is with outlook.com because their MTA-STS validator is… for lack of a better word: wrong. I decided that
19.
▲
by
mpldr
4y ago
They should pay their engineers to fix their MTA-STS validation. Haven't done so in ages. If you think you're not up to selfhosting (which in my experience is quite feasible and comfortable): please choose a provider that is not o
20.
▲
by
mpldr
4y ago
This. So much this. It's fine to not use the latest version, but use a supported version. If the version is EOL, don't use it. Even if you have backports. Otherwise you will inevitably run into issues where the system is insecur
21.
▲
by
mpldr
4y ago
Hey, Kernel version 3 is not that old.
22.
▲
by
mpldr
4y ago
Looks cool! What are it's advantages over hugo?
23.
▲
by
mpldr
4y ago
> If they are going to do it, it should only ever be on an OPT-IN basis. They made their case against it, and I can even understand the reasoning behind it. Doesn't mean I have to agree though.
24.
▲
An attempt at making opt-out telemetry easier to decline
(do-not-track.dev)
1 points
by
mpldr
4y ago
|
2 comments
25.
▲
by
mpldr
4y ago
I made this in response to the current Go telemetry issue, where the Go team wishes to add telemetry to the toolchain. After seeing this over and over and over again, I would like to propose a standard ENV that indicates that a user does no