Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
monerozcash
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
I mean, at that point, why wouldn't you just rely on a DGA? At least then you wouldn't be flooding block explorer sites with millions or potentially tens of millions of requests per day for your C&C traffic. Essentially the ex
2.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
I'm not 100% sure I understand what you're saying, but I guess you're asking how this could be censored? > you would have to extract the keys from the malware Yeah? That happens all the time. If you're designing mecha
3.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
There are much lighter alternatives though, why would you want to bother with cryptocurrencies when you could just use DHT? I mean, even just shipping a Tor client embedded in your malware seems like a much better idea. >just rely on exp
4.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
For what it's worth, that doesn't seem to ever have worked.
5.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
> physical address Not unique to a person > email address, phone number Also often not unique to a person, although email addresses probably tend to have much longer lifespans as identifiers than phone numbers. If the idea is to have
6.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
That may be, but you can't just keep going to the same US court for warrants.
7.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
> Once they finally have a solid court order to seize domains, generally the rate at which they get seized accelerates greatly. Given that most ccTLDs live in different jurisdictions, that's not really a huge problem.
8.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
> I would have assumed that this function mainly migrated onto one of the popular blockchains with clients using one of thousands of available gateways for reading. Why would you want to use blockchains for this? DHT has been used for di
9.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
You could of course key on things like SSNs, but data brokers wouldn't be very happy about that because there are lots of SSNs tied to multiple different people.
10.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
[flagged]
11.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
>Anyone who in 2025 still blindly believes what Donald Trump says is an idiot. And even if that were true, you'd still be an idiot for assuming that Trumps motivations are grounded in reality. Oh wow, we're in 2026 already.
12.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
Not really, no. You'd need an avalanche for that Based on the pictures of the car, I can't even imagine how you'd get the car stuck there, much less get stuck inside the car. This was a rural area, but he was a few hundred me
13.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
Refreshing the page fixed that for me on Safari.
14.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
I somehow doubt anyone has ever experienced this problem with the 2006 Motorola Razr
15.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
Yeah, I seriously doubt that there's a single car with which this would actually be difficult to accomplish. Even if you can't pull the modem or the sim card (less common now) directly, you can certainly always find and disable th
16.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
To ... lose money?
17.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
I just pulled the antennas on both of those, I don't think there's an easily accessible fuse that wouldn't cut off a bunch of other stuff.
18.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
>They have the largest global oil reserves. So what? That's not very useful when getting said oil out of the ground costs more than you can sell it for, is it?
19.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
I've done this on a W222, a W223, a continental GT and an Urus. On each of those cars it was as easy as disconnecting the antenna, on none of them did I have to tear into the roof pillars. I've never seen an antenna that was diffi
20.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
This doesn't seem like a particularly good reason to not buy a car. Either you need one or don't. Removing network connectivity from basically any new car is trivial, often as simple as pulling an easily accessible fuse.
21.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
>> "The opposition has been very public in their lobbying for foreign intervention in Venezuela" is not an assumption, it is a direct reference to evidence >... and is not the statement in question. >The statement in q
22.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
I didn't find AirDrop to work very well while trying to airdrop only 1TB of photos/videos from my phone to my MacBook, YMMV. Not only was it really slow, but occasionally it seemed to freeze and there weren't really any meani
23.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
Less than 1% of global oil consumption.
24.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
> Yes it's a fact and not merely a commonly held view that Trump's campaign had Russian actors, but reasonable people still consider him President Yes, because that in no way invalidates the election results. I really don'
25.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
[flagged]
26.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
Yes because the only reason Chinese government officials would talk with Venezuela is because China wants to spin up large-scale oil production there? Literally no other reason they could possibly be talking, right?
27.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
It's not a narrative, it's a fact you can easily verify by accessing the internet using the device in front of you. The idea that oil in Venezuela is particularly attractive to anyone is patently absurd. Crude oil prices are alrea
28.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
>If one can mine a block with 3000 transactions (11-12 hashes to the header) in 10 minutes, one can mine a block with one transaction (1 hash to header) about ten times as fast. Huh? Surely the attempts for both take exactly the same amo
29.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
>This is why I have yet to use AI, and will probably never. >AI. Is. Not. Useful. Why waste time writing things like this? What's the point?
30.
▲
by
monerozcash
9mo ago
Much of this stuff is incredibly easy to hide, hard to imagine that. Surely you'd want to have MANPADS distributed widely in preparation for a possible US strike too.
More ›