mola

50 ms·

571.
by mola 6y ago
Did you read the allegations? These are people accused of stealing money from the tunisian population. For me it falls under oppression of citizens. Even if you don't agree, they are criminals. Not war crime prosecutors, whose crime is
572.
by mola 6y ago
I see. But talks of potential war and the actuality of targeting these type of individuals is different. Both are very scary, but only one, for now, is an actuality.
573.
by mola 6y ago
So now you're saying attacking the netherlands is the same as not cooperating with the ICC? They don't have to attack netherland nor sanction the prosecutors to ward off the ICC, they choose to use escalation of force, because tha
574.
by mola 6y ago
Sorry, but that's lazy thinking. I used the term steer the boat for a reason. He was in charge of a huge system with its own momentum expecting a change of the sort you want is just silly. US abandoning all the fronts he had would&#x27
575.
by mola 6y ago
Well that's still is politics. The US lost its marbles after 9/11. Obama was trying to stear the boat a different way, but he didn't have the support of the legislative bodies which made it their job to give him hell no matte
576.
by mola 6y ago
These people are not head of states, they are not war criminals, they do no oppress their citizens, they are not building weapons of mass destruction. These are the causes for the sanctions you are talking about. Come on. That's bird l
577.
by mola 6y ago
You are using supposed "rationality" to just ignore facts and reality. US is entitled to not cooperate. But bullying individual prosecutors is disgusting.
578.
by mola 6y ago
Let's say there's a bully, and he just takes and steal stuff. And then there's a big guy seeing that and telling the bully to fuck off and let the kids play without fear. Both are power moves. Do you think they're the sa
579.
by mola 6y ago
Trade wars with Europe China Mexico
580.
by mola 6y ago
There's a huge difference between refusing to cooperate and sanctioning indviduals. The latter is a fear tactic move. Mafia style.
581.
by mola 6y ago
Disgusting. This administration is shattering any form of international cooperation not based on power and submission. This brings humanity back to a pre WWs mentality.
582.
by mola 6y ago
Except she was voted without cheating, never killed the opposition or controls all branches of government and media.
583.
by mola 6y ago
I dunno, colleges in Europe fair well, there most countries just subsidize tuition. And rely on tradition and non rational incentives to keep quality reasonable. The failure modes arise when the actors are rational and profit oriented.
584.
by mola 6y ago
If she has no recourse than the only form of justice she has available is an eye of an eye. She's a single person against a huge conglomerate like vice. Sadly, legal means are not relevant in that situation. If you don't want to l
585.
by mola 6y ago
If there's an algorithm in charge of optimizing, it will be gamed. If there's a single algorithm controlling a large population, it'll be catastrophically gamed.
586.
by mola 6y ago
This has nothing to do with logic or rationality. No one is capable of fact checking everything. At best the rational choice is to not believe anyone. Which is exactly what most adversarial information actors want to achieve. When we lose t
587.
by mola 6y ago
Divide and conquer and not acting in good faith. This is no more than racketeering.
588.
by mola 6y ago
Religion is mainly used as opium for the masses China puting people in concentration camps is evil, but has nothing to do with religion. Also the CCP days as ideological communism are long gone. And pretty sure Marx wouldn't condone an
589.
by mola 6y ago
Just buy less. Western consumerism gave China it's power. Have a leader who the world believe he acts in good faith regarding ideals, and not busy subverting ideals for game and profit. But no, you'll choose power and war.
590.
by mola 6y ago
Well, US greed gave China this power. Cancel culture have nothing to do with this. There were a lot of left leaning voices in the ninetees warning against the trajectory of globalism. The sell out of US manufacturing was done by people with
591.
by mola 6y ago
Why is a single global isp good? That's basically saying a single company owning and controlling the internet. That sounds dystopic
592.
by mola 6y ago
I'm not attributing malice at all. The moral obligation of corporation is value for share holders. Shading the satellites doesn't add value. Thus no reason to even think about it, unless there's a public outcry which might da
593.
by mola 6y ago
Monopolistic communication network. Sorry, it's hard to see the benefits.
594.
by mola 6y ago
Why would SpaceX care about shading the satellite if there wasn't a movement raising its voice? Plus, I don't quite get how thousands of tiny satellites used for communication on the planet will make advance us a space faring rac
595.
by mola 6y ago
Well then something is broken with PT in your neck of the woods. Too bad for you.
596.
by mola 6y ago
I dunno to me it sounds horrific that Machiavellism is accepted without a pause knowing how inefficient and detrimental it is for human cooperative endavours. History showed us that unchecked Machiavellism causes dynamics to devolve to para
597.
by mola 6y ago
I think this is interpreted backwards. It was a policy decision to allow a controlled amount of public gatherings. As a measure to return to normality. Scientists are using the opportunity to investigate the outcome. Thus they can advise th
598.
by mola 6y ago
I wish university PR teams will stop peddling "cutting edge" science to the masses. I know people in the field know that fmri is problematic, but when the masses don't. We need to stop confusing the public with PR pieces and
599.
by mola 6y ago
Such a darwinistic approach to policy. A failed business model artificially injected with tons of money wastes time and energy of the regulator which could be spent on actual real problems and not made up ones created by an agglomeration of
600.
by mola 6y ago
Why talk about optics? This is not about what seems bad, it's about what US democracy deemed is a felony. If I was CF I wouldn't want a criminal mind working for me, how can you trust him when you know he lies and cover up. I just

More ›