moktonar

3 ms·

1.
by moktonar 12d ago
Ethics matter a lot, you can do whatever you want and be considered a very bad human being as a result. The result matters, but it also matters the discrepancy between what you do and what you claim you do. Bruteforce != ai did it. And that
2.
by moktonar 12d ago
Shouldn’t this be a democratic process?
3.
by moktonar 13d ago
Ruining a lifetime worth of research effort, passing bruteforce as achievement, thus lying, just to appear first in position, is something to be ashamed of IMO.
4.
by moktonar 13d ago
They took a lifetime of research effort, threw millions of dollars of compute at it and claimed their AI solved a MPP, and they did all this just to be the first to claim the prize. Once you knew the direction, given the new insights on the
5.
by moktonar 15d ago
OpenAI should just apologize for having been too greedy. That’s it, as simple as it gets. The fact that it never will is the biggest red flag.
6.
by moktonar 1mo ago
As I said: it never really was. And another important thing to put forward is: it’s not the AI the “zero days everything” the bugs are already there, just unexplored.. it’s just surfacing the reality
7.
by moktonar 1mo ago
The real bigger elephant in the room is: assume nothing is safe anymore (not that it ever was, but now more than ever)
8.
by moktonar 1mo ago
The comments problem is a big one and no matter how hard I try the LLM will always write them verbosely. I find that including the rules in each prompt is fare more effective than once in the context
9.
by moktonar 1mo ago
Surprise! The man in the middle man-in-the-middles! This is only the beginning, when you’ll get used to this they’ll do worse and worse, enshittification, remember?
10.
by moktonar 2mo ago
They should try to forecast earthquakes, that would really be a breakthrough If anything better than random comes out
11.
by moktonar 2mo ago
Waiting for the “Our model inadvertently hacked the nukes and launched Armageddon” title
12.
by moktonar 3mo ago
The problem is that the more AI eats labor, the more you can hike the costs until you pretty much can match the salary of the workers you replaced, with some margin, enough for the user to accept the cost. That’s what will happen in the nex
13.
by moktonar 3mo ago
Did the Feds desperately need a way of getting the key? is this a bugdoor? Has the commits been traced? Recently I’ve been seeing this pattern a lot and I’m starting to be a little bit suspicious. Maybe it’s because people are more sensible
14.
by moktonar 3mo ago
And so it begun.. Jokes aside does anybody else notice the eerie similarities with gray aliens?
15.
by moktonar 4mo ago
I think we should start having ai versions like beta ora alpha versions and then consolidate them into human made versions with time, at least one is free to stay safe or on the bleeding edge as one likes and we all get a win-win best-of-al
16.
by moktonar 4mo ago
Inexistent security, absent security contacts/hard to get in touch with, denial/delay/won’t patch, most functionality to deploy a backdoor is already present, to me equals bugdoor. This is wanted behavior, not an accident, an
17.
by moktonar 4mo ago
int x[n] and int *x are very different things when it comes to defining memory layout tho. In one case you end up with n int sized slots of memory, in the second with one register sized slot. That makes all the difference when defining stru
18.
by moktonar 5mo ago
I get what he’s saying, but, doesn’t he compare classical speed up of parallelizing 64 bit key space on 2^16 cpus with parallelizing 128 bits key space on QCs? It’s true that sqrt (2^128/2^16) = 2^56 and that 56 >> 48, but in one
19.
by moktonar 6mo ago
Except maybe storing another smaller vector for the difference with the original data an also quantize that maybe recursively
20.
by moktonar 6mo ago
Aren’t polar coordinates still n-1 + 1 for radius for n-dim vector? If so I understand that angles can be quantized better but when radius r is big the error is large for highly quantized angles right? What am I missing?
21.
by moktonar 7mo ago
Is it possible to do the inverse, then? (Tranforming weights back to code)
22.
by moktonar 7mo ago
Thank you for all the work guys, I’ll see how I can help.
23.
by moktonar 7mo ago
Well fucking done. Anthropic has just gained the “has bollocks” status. Also now we know what the govt is really up to with AI. G fucking g
24.
by moktonar 7mo ago
The random uuid selection is far superior because of lifespan, you can only have so many functioning devices at the same time, and on the contrary to tree-based uuids once a device is decommissioned the uuid can be reclaimed. Practically t
25.
by moktonar 7mo ago
UB is the definition of Free Will that’s why you can’t control it, and for a programmer something that cannot be controlled is felt as dangerous..
26.
by moktonar 8mo ago
Bugdoors, bugdoors everywhere.. The fact that they refuse to fix is the sketchiest part, and also they should be held accountable for things like this IMO
27.
by moktonar 8mo ago
I can already envision a “I’m not human” captcha, for sites like this. Who will be the first to implement it? (Looks at Cloudflare)
28.
by moktonar 8mo ago
I agree but if you can infer that maybe there are children running around because it’s the time they get out of school etc, then yes, you stop at every double parked car.. I’m not saying it’s easy to do, I’m just saying that’s a limitation
29.
by moktonar 8mo ago
You are predicting stuff that your sensors don’t see all the time my friend
30.
by moktonar 8mo ago
> detects foot movement .. That’s probably how they do it, which is again very clever stuff, chapeau. But they do it like that b/c they can’t really predict the world around them fast enough. It might be possible in the future with

More ›