Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mm263
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
It's totally unfair to say that we don't understand design systems or component libraries when I mentioned in multiple comments that in our case we don't have a component library. Component library is a valid use case, as I m
62.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
It's not equivalent. Storybook has lots of features and plugins that make it useful. What I'm saying is that effectively, my team has been using Storybook to develop components in isolation from the backend or the rest of the app
63.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
> I don't think the point is to isolate all state We may have been using it incorrectly in my team, but our pattern is moving out all of the state out of the component, essentially separating the logic from the view.
64.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
The Storybook use case and the MSW use case is fairly similar to me: develop your SPA in separation from the backend and this is how Storybook was pitched to me and is usually pitched. Both allow me to hook up the backend after a component
65.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
> For those wondering what the use case is, you must not have tried it. It does take work to set up (with each version that's less), but it can be very nice to test in isolation esp in cases where a component is under a login, the 4
66.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
Yes, sorry for the confusion
67.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
I've used Storybook during development for a while now and the use case you present is how the Storybook is usually pitched. I actually agree about the simplicity of discovering the components. What I disagree with, though, is that I c
68.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
I'd be curious to hear from everyone what's the use case for using Storybook in 2024? The only one I can think of is developing a UI library, but for the usual SPA development, it seems to me that MSW provides a much smoother and
69.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
Oh no! This is unreadable and unmaintainable.
70.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
Your use case is fairly specific. Tailwind is a tool, if it doesn't make sense to you and your use case, it's okay to not use it. That said, it's not okay to misrepresent what Tailwind actually is like the original commenter
71.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
Why use a bad faith interpretation of what Tailwind is? You know this isn't what it looks like when you are developing
72.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
I think they nailed every Mastodon criticism that I've heard floating around and addressed it, however I'm especially curious to learn about the moderation layer in-depth.
73.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
I've been using it for a while as my main browser and it suffers from all of the usual issues that early development stage browsers have: bugs, memory leaks. The bugs are nasty as well, I'm sometimes forced to switch back to Firef
74.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
It isn't really applicable here since Prettier was de-facto standard at pretty much every place I've worked at - start-ups to FAANG
75.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
I'd argue that we should deport all Russian citizens back to Russia from all of the countries then! Why stop at Chile?
76.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
He is in Chile. The company linked was liquidated in 2021 (including other companies called Sarafan that he created in the past). How did you deduce that money goes to Russia?
77.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
The company is liquidated, which means he doesn't do business in Russia. Also, I love living in the world where doing business is suspicious because of my nationality.
78.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
How exactly did 11 million dollars turn to 600?
79.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
AI is already here. Advancements in the next 5-10 years are going to be unprecedented. Will we be able to spin up a safety net at the same pace?
80.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
Could you recommend anything specific please?
81.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
This dude talks about directly punishing people for not meeting deadlines and monetary rewards for completing tasks. This is weird, patronizing, de-motivating. I would run from him as fast as possible. > She already knows what she is wo
82.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
The point is that your aspirational number may be way, way off. Not saying the aspirational number is how I got twice the salary I planned to ask for as a junior while interviewing for my first job years ago.
83.
▲
by
mm263
3y ago
You can poll people about things that they want, but (like it happened with many great inventions) people don't actually know what they need. Do they want less car-centric environment? Most will answer "no" because they'