miroljub

11 ms·

271.
by miroljub 9mo ago
Yeah, we definitely need to put more weather stations in urban areas and remove rural ones. That's how we can reach first place every year. Being number 3 is disappointing.
272.
by miroljub 9mo ago
And you believe they won't try again and again until they push it through? All of these have already been rejected multiple times, and yet some parts of it are already enacted, some will be soon, and the rest will come after a few more
273.
by miroljub 9mo ago
> Any source for this? Ever heard about Chat Control and CSAM?
274.
by miroljub 9mo ago
Too bad Briar and similar anonymous E2E messengers would be banned soon across the EU and UK.
275.
by miroljub 9mo ago
People still need to ask, and they still keep asking. It's just they are asking there where they expect they'll reach a better answer faster than on SO.
276.
by miroljub 9mo ago
Their precious pipelines could just be blown up by an unknown actor the moment the US president says the UK will not get any gas through them. The North Stream scenario could just repeat.
277.
by miroljub 9mo ago
Nice. Without trying it, just by looking at screenshots, I wonder how your navigation works. Are you calculating the route or just pointing the user in the general direction?
278.
by miroljub 9mo ago
You just gave one more argument for having guns. If he didn't have a gun, maybe he would be driven over by the car. Possibly a few more people too. In Europe, where guns are less prevalent, cars are the favorite weapon used by terroris
279.
by miroljub 9mo ago
> Hardly relevant. If you control guns better, you get fewer illegal weapons as well. Most of the murders in Europe are committed by illegal weapons as well. Since you bring up Europe, I can give you a counterexample of Switzerland, whic
280.
by miroljub 9mo ago
Most of the murders (homicides) in the USA are committed using illegal weapons. Banning legal weapons wouldn't reduce crime, it would just make it harder for victims to defend themselves. Besides, USA is not a good example. According t
281.
by miroljub 9mo ago
Well World Economic Forum (WEF) lists Tony Blair and his institute as one of the top Agenda contributors [1]. It's not even funny that you can trace almost any person responsible for the deterioration of human rights in Western society
282.
by miroljub 9mo ago
And the brilliant MI6 / BBC propaganda made it as if 1984 were about the Soviet Union :) As if it was not enough that the author himself put it in Britain. If you want Soviet Style distopia, better read "We" from Zamyatin.
283.
by miroljub 9mo ago
Does it get worse? They are making a benchmark that is hard to beat.
284.
by miroljub 9mo ago
> So media control, regulation by enforcement, and institutional control becomes the focus of effort. You forgot gun control. That's the first thing they took away. Thereafter, freedom after freedom has been made optional by the gov
285.
by miroljub 9mo ago
Sex Pistols are more actual than ever. God save the Queen The fascist regime It made you a moron Potential H-bomb God save the Queen She ain't no human being There is no future In England's dreami
286.
by miroljub 9mo ago
> Or to be blunt: correctness should not be opt-in. It should be opt-out. One can perfectly fine write correct programs using mutable variables. It's not a security feature, it's a design decision. That being said, I agree with
287.
by miroljub 10mo ago
That logic is flawed. The end value and ROI for S&P500 is the same regardless of the currency used to display it. It's the same as complaining that the temperature increased more in Fahrenheit than in Celsius. EDIT: The total value
288.
by miroljub 10mo ago
?
289.
by miroljub 10mo ago
That's the definition of censorship.
290.
by miroljub 10mo ago
I don't see mass protests across USA against Grenland policy of current US regime.
291.
by miroljub 10mo ago
As an European I'd be rather tracked by an American (out Chinese, Russian, ...) company than by an EU or European regimes. Those companies are less likely to imprison or censor me than the regime who rules over Europe.
292.
by miroljub 10mo ago
I specifically mentioned foreign policy. There, I don't remember a single US government that was not a net negative for the rest of the world (Israel excluded).
293.
by miroljub 10mo ago
> When Trump pressures RIPE NCC or APNIC to deregister an IP address block sed "/Trump/US-Govt/g" Why do people here always casually single out Trump? He's not an outlier, it's just how US foreign polic
294.
by miroljub 10mo ago
That's a common problem of English, German, and a few more Wikipedia editor gangs seeing themselves as the moral guardians of the internet. If you switch to some other languages, you'll find the links.
295.
by miroljub 10mo ago
> Linking to illegal services can be illegal, that’s why. What is illegal in one country can be illegal everywhere. I don't remember Wikipedia removing LGBTIAQ++ articles just because that's illegal in Iran. If a government thi
296.
by miroljub 10mo ago
Anna Archive is a notable project. Wikipedia displays links to projects. It's not about "being used as DNS" but about providing basic info about the topic, URL being an important part of it.
297.
by miroljub 10mo ago
No, I just said promiscuous people are riskier. If you trust your spouse to cheat on you, and you don't want to kick them out, you'd better vaccinate.
298.
by miroljub 10mo ago
This just shows Google engineering is a corporate shithole. It's time to sell Google stocks.
299.
by miroljub 10mo ago
Than take a jab, since your risk assessment shows you'll benefit from it. But then, don't blame me for your partner being a slut.
300.
by miroljub 10mo ago
They now employ minors? Besides, how realistic is a fear that a law abiding citizen would be endangered by the ICE?

More ›