mirko22

15 ms·

121.
by mirko22 8y ago
my opinion is that you were downvoted cos people really want to use Facebook for whatever reason and when you say they don’t need it they start shaking... so yes, it is an addiction. and also, i see internet as public space, YOU are respons
122.
by mirko22 8y ago
But is it only facebook the ? should twitter, linkedin, google plus etc all pull ou since they can be used for the same purpose?
123.
by mirko22 8y ago
But internet should be free for all, how you use it it is up to you. Shutting down communication channels will not stop violence.
124.
by mirko22 8y ago
Exactly my point, personally i am much more worried about government surveillance, my point was that facebook is an optional thing and very little people really need it (places where facebook is internet) as compared to real environment aro
125.
by mirko22 8y ago
I was not talking about the law, but about similar cases where face recouia used without consent...
126.
by mirko22 8y ago
uploading my images, specially taken on public ground, is not in any way illegal. And i am unable to influence if someone will put them on facebook or upload them to porn sites or use them as meme on 9gag... if my picture ends up on random
127.
by mirko22 8y ago
Germany did yet you don’t see people making a fuss about it. As much as I hate Facebook I think a lot of people just complain about it cos it so high profile. But if you don’t care about privacy everywhere, what does make Facebook special
128.
by mirko22 8y ago
whataboutism? sorry, what? i thought taking precedents was standard practice in law...
129.
by mirko22 8y ago
Why is it ok to be filmed and face recognized by surveillance cameras on train station but it is wrong when Facebook does it? In my opinion I don’t need to use facebook and give them my data voluntarily but I kinda need to use the train and
130.
by mirko22 9y ago
I assume it would not be one process common to all of them, but more like with some you will have to mine additional stuff like Thorium which you have nothing to do with later, or you will have to wash them with other chemicals and stuff t
131.
by mirko22 9y ago
Yeah, I get that same thing, so tried Chrome and Firefox until i figured out they don’t support extensions such as uBlock, then went to try those built in blockers, and while i kinda understand why they built them into the system it seems m
132.
by mirko22 9y ago
Wish they would let me start blocking adds in browsers :/
133.
by mirko22 9y ago
so we should shut off everything that has potential for slave trade? like phones? email? post mail? cars? what?
134.
by mirko22 9y ago
botcoin did happen though. So it is not that unimaginable
135.
by mirko22 9y ago
not necessarily, 50-100 person team in random bank for example can’t even do all of the tickets they should in whatever timeframe they have less alone refactor something properly, and not cos they are busy, but for variety of other reasons,
136.
by mirko22 9y ago
but of course that is not what memo said...
137.
by mirko22 9y ago
But GDPR says even if data us anonymized but can be tied to a natural person in “reasonable” manner it is still illegal. then it gives some vage examples of what might be considered reasonable... so a lawyer could still make a case that tra
138.
by mirko22 9y ago
Yes, so do we have to have similar laws now and wait for them to backfire to take them away again? This law has seriously impacted WiFi availability in Germany for some time. Torrent laws are used by lawyers and scamers to send out fines to
139.
by mirko22 9y ago
Single notice doesn't make it better, and sorry if my phrasing is not the best. And it is about cookies too... What about massive fines for small companies? Large ones will pay and continue making money off your data while the small co
140.
by mirko22 9y ago
Buzzwords... like empowering? One example is that now my websites need to have full screen agreement popup for each 3rd party cookie which will not help anyone do anything. You can already set 3rd party cookie preferences in browser. Do you
141.
by mirko22 9y ago
More protected? I guess that is one way of looking at it. Like the law about the cookie popup. Brings nothing of value but you can get in trouble if you don’t have it, does it make you feel more protected? I mostly see this as a way to fine
142.
by mirko22 9y ago
How do you figure that? Who else should worry about it?
143.
by mirko22 9y ago
I have similar problems, but when i make my own bread it does not happen... I think it has to do more with additives and other stuff they put in wheat-based baked goods these days that actually trigger reactions. Bread used to go dry after
144.
by mirko22 9y ago
> genderedness of the phrase, a few warnings are warranted Are you serious? You are comparing physical harassment against your body with freedom of speech? Wow... No, it does not warrant a warning. Otherwise we can get offended by random
145.
by mirko22 9y ago
Yeah, it was more tongue in cheek argument, but sadly i feel like it is truth.
146.
by mirko22 9y ago
No, i am not advocating reductionism, server has a analogical meaning as it serves something. Processing has analogical meaning as we do processes something, serverless implies there are no servers involved. As far as managing goes, most of
147.
by mirko22 9y ago
My point is that i was not aware what "serverless" meant when i first came upon it and the word itself did not convey any meaning without a lot of context as it does not lend it self to analogies such as "server", "
148.
by mirko22 9y ago
I explicitly stated that by analogy it does not make sense, while containers contain something and works as analogy. But you chose to disregard that part of the answer.
149.
by mirko22 9y ago
> Though the functions are serverless in the sense that you needn't allocate virtual infrastructure, the platform obviously utilizes CPU resources to execute your function. So it does allocate virtual infrastructure?
150.
by mirko22 9y ago
Yeah I have the same issue as it forbids the loading of urls but does not disable the javascript so that it uses <noscript>

More ›