miragecraft

11 ms·

91.
by miragecraft 4y ago
I’ve had a horrible experience with Paypal in the past and I harbor an unnatural hatred for the company. Granted with the size of the customer base most people will be fine, but once Paypal soft lock the account Flipper Zero should have imm
92.
by miragecraft 4y ago
It's never unlimited, the terms and conditions for shared hosting are specifically designed to prohibit use cases (ex. file storage not connected with a website) that generate excessive usage. And if you somehow find a loophole you&#x2
93.
by miragecraft 4y ago
> I feel there is a lot of room to develop better tools that are not so horrid Most organizations have horribly convoluted organizational structures and processes, and SAP has been shaped by those customers over the years to cater to tho
94.
by miragecraft 4y ago
It's still here, just no longer profitable. Frameworks are needed for web apps, especially single page applications (SPAs), if you just want to build traditional page/document based sites the traditional methods work just fine. Ho
95.
by miragecraft 4y ago
Is it really bait and switch if the company has a contributor/committer license agreement in place? Having that license made it clear the company want to reserve the right to change the license, including going to closed source if they
96.
by miragecraft 4y ago
I’m actually a big fan of the BSL license, as if it gains popularity for commercial software there would be a lot less risk of vendor lock-in like with Adobe and Autodesk. I don’t mind paying for good software, but too many companies abuse
97.
by miragecraft 4y ago
It’s free for companies with less than 25m annual revenue, just so you know.
98.
by miragecraft 4y ago
That’s the benefit of BSL license - it forces the developer to continuously deliver value in each release because they are competing with themselves from 3 years ago.
99.
by miragecraft 4y ago
It’s not some “cause”, it’s the base of operations for an online harassment group. And what playbook? Oh so Cloudflare decided to kick one site off now they “have to” kick everyone else off? Why? Are they legally obligated to? Cloudflare ca
100.
by miragecraft 4y ago
I don't get it, Cloudflare is not the court, nor is it a monopoly. It's not some tragic Greek hero holding the line for freedom of speech. It's just a business, and business can decide to not provide service to assholes, just
101.
by miragecraft 4y ago
Precedent from decisions on The Daily Stormer and 8chan was used to pressure Cloudflare to deplatform human rights organizations by authoritarian governments. Cloudflare isn’t a court, its decisions are not legal precedents, it can decide
102.
by miragecraft 4y ago
If you’re the digital equivalent of the Fire Department and shouldn’t refuse service, why are you treating hosting differently? Is it because they can get hosting elsewhere? Well they can get web security elsewhere too, what’s the differenc
103.
by miragecraft 4y ago
I’m not convinced running your own service is cheaper than paid solutions in general, if Slack can provide the same service for cheaper than it should be considered even if it’s no longer free. I also don’t see it as a moral failing for a c
104.
by miragecraft 4y ago
That’s not how marketing works for luxury products (such as fine art), the free/cheap access to see the art is to raise awareness so that they will be impressed by people who actually owns the art. It increases prestige and pride of ow
105.
by miragecraft 4y ago
Doesn't the :has() selector already cause unbounded lookahead?
106.
by miragecraft 4y ago
I support @nest always with implicit &, so @nest .child {} equals @nest & .child {}
107.
by miragecraft 4y ago
It's the classic chicken and egg problem. The lookahead only need to be applied to nested selectors. But you can't know whether something is a nested selector until AFTER you applied the lookahead.