mikert89

17 ms·

361.
by mikert89 1y ago
Yeah they have a rigid structure of document writing, most of which is now obsolete.
362.
by mikert89 1y ago
the article is a misrepresentation of amazon work culture, what do you want me to say
363.
by mikert89 1y ago
leadership principles are relevant to high level amazon employees, L6 and below they are used as a control mechanism/justification to call out low performance
364.
by mikert89 1y ago
Clearly youve never worked inside these companies
365.
by mikert89 1y ago
Amazon is a far cry from the glory days of the past. 80% of corporate workers are visa workers that spend all of their time managing and maintaining the massive complexity inside the company. There is no leadership principles, its just low
366.
by mikert89 1y ago
its risky for big companies to move quickly. They mostly want to maintain what they have. its a myth that they want to innovate daily
367.
by mikert89 1y ago
I think Microsoft actually just hired experienced H1Bs instead of new college grads. And they have such a moat with their corporate customers using excel, outlook, etc that execution doesnt matter as much for them.
368.
by mikert89 1y ago
Yeah it sounds like a bad technical implementation
369.
by mikert89 1y ago
its weird because every website has some form of censorship where you cant event bring up these types of issues without getting banned/flagged
370.
by mikert89 1y ago
all the tech companies are filled to the brim with h1b visa holders working around the clock for average pay. this has nothing to do with ai, and everything to do with importing workers that are desperate to be here, and so work like dogs.
371.
by mikert89 1y ago
People that dont/wont use ai models are unironically lacking the creative capacity to understand the different ways the models can be used
372.
by mikert89 1y ago
This is just to walk back previous statements by Andy Jessy. Political theater
373.
by mikert89 1y ago
yeah like we are living in the dawn of the future. science fiction is now real. aliens live among us, locked in sillicon.
374.
by mikert89 1y ago
its in the running for the biggest technological change maybe in the last 100 years? whats so confusing about this, thinking machines have been invented
375.
by mikert89 1y ago
if they stop the skincare routine, it will take years to recover to baseline
376.
by mikert89 1y ago
The CEO went to harvard and did well in some math competitions. Believe it or not, alot of fundraising isnt much deeper than this
377.
by mikert89 1y ago
clearly you dont have the critical thinking skills to understand my post
378.
by mikert89 1y ago
I'm a strong believer in the "no free lunch principle" Through a lifetime of experiences with different substances, the body always adjusts to whatever you're taking. Taking a stimulant? the brain will down regulate dopa
379.
by mikert89 1y ago
I use repo prompt to build the prompt manually with the code files. Then give it to ChatGPT in the console. Then I have cursor ingrate the results. I actually think cursor alone is not that good
380.
by mikert89 1y ago
Actually will agree that o1 pro was better than o3 at really deep bug finding/coding analysis. Which is also why i have the theory that they could just turn up the compute to show better results, but dont do to cost. O3 and GPT5 seem h
381.
by mikert89 1y ago
They are clearly building the product for mass adoption, not power users
382.
by mikert89 1y ago
I'm surprised how few people are using it
383.
by mikert89 1y ago
I think it is, I've been using these models for 6 hours a day for almost a year. At any given time I have 2 of the max subscriptions (right now grok and openai). I have a bug that was a complex interaction between backend and front end
384.
by mikert89 1y ago
I still think GPT5 is really a cost cutting measure, with a company that is trying to grow to 1 billion users on a product that needs GPUs. I dont see anyone talking about GPT 5 Pro, which I personally tested against: - Grok 4 Heavy - Opus
385.
by mikert89 1y ago
This isnt the correct comparison, since most people getting into the top schools are completely undifferentiated, all have maxed out GPAs and near perfect/perfect SATs. There are for more people with the profile to get into harvard, th
386.
by mikert89 1y ago
The problem with this is it creates a caste system that gets locked in based on how you did on math tests when you were 14. There is certainly predictive power, but people get into these schools for all sorts of reasons. Also, there are unf
387.
by mikert89 1y ago
alot of the success of FAANG is they stopped using this as a primary vetting method, and used leetcode to just filter on raw memorization/problem solving. filtered out so many bad candidates from prestigious schools
388.
by mikert89 1y ago
Have you used the Pro version? Its incredible
389.
by mikert89 1y ago
AGI is launching, lets complain about the charts
390.
by mikert89 1y ago
ACCELERATE

More ›