4 ms·

I think it is, I've been using these models for 6 hours a day for almost a year. At any given time I have 2 of the max subscriptions (right now grok and openai)

I think it is, I've been using these models for 6 hours a day for almost a year. At any given time I have 2 of the max subscriptions (right now grok and openai). I have a bug that was a complex interaction between backend and front end over websockets. The day before I was banging my head against the wall with o3 pro and grok heavy, gpt5 solved it first try. I think its also true that most people arent pushing the limits on the models, and dont even really know how to correctly push the limits. Which is also why openai is not focussed on the best models

I_am_tiberius 1y ago
Similar usage as me, but I don't see a difference between o3-pro and 5-pro. Sounds odd, but my impression is that o1-pro was better at creating complex independent small functions than o3-pro/5-pro.
- mikert89 1y ago
  Actually will agree that o1 pro was better than o3 at really deep bug finding/coding analysis. Which is also why i have the theory that they could just turn up the compute to show better results, but dont do to cost. O3 and GPT5 seem heavily quantized, o1 pro was more raw Another thing I’ll add though, is o3 pro is better through the api than the chat website. They clearly constrain it unless you’re paying the absurd api cost
  - I_am_tiberius 1y ago
    yes, I think that's right. o1-pro for sure was too expensive for them.
nojs 1y ago
How are you using GPT5 for coding (Cursor?)
- mikert89 1y ago
  I use repo prompt to build the prompt manually with the code files. Then give it to ChatGPT in the console. Then I have cursor ingrate the results. I actually think cursor alone is not that good
energy123 1y ago
Has anyone noticed that OpenAI is cutting off submitted context in ChatGPT Pro? If I send about 60k tokens, the model can't see the question (at the bottom of the text). I need to reduce it to 50k. If I send two prompts with 40k tokens, the model can't see the beginning of the first prompt. This seems quite unethical given they advertise 128k context, and I doubt it's an accident (since it runs in the direction of cost savings).

I_am_tiberius 1y ago

Similar usage as me, but I don't see a difference between o3-pro and 5-pro. Sounds odd, but my impression is that o1-pro was better at creating complex independent small functions than o3-pro/5-pro.

mikert89 1y ago
Actually will agree that o1 pro was better than o3 at really deep bug finding/coding analysis. Which is also why i have the theory that they could just turn up the compute to show better results, but dont do to cost. O3 and GPT5 seem heavily quantized, o1 pro was more raw Another thing I’ll add though, is o3 pro is better through the api than the chat website. They clearly constrain it unless you’re paying the absurd api cost
- I_am_tiberius 1y ago
  yes, I think that's right. o1-pro for sure was too expensive for them.

nojs 1y ago

How are you using GPT5 for coding (Cursor?)

mikert89 1y ago
I use repo prompt to build the prompt manually with the code files. Then give it to ChatGPT in the console. Then I have cursor ingrate the results. I actually think cursor alone is not that good

energy123 1y ago

Has anyone noticed that OpenAI is cutting off submitted context in ChatGPT Pro? If I send about 60k tokens, the model can't see the question (at the bottom of the text). I need to reduce it to 50k. If I send two prompts with 40k tokens, the model can't see the beginning of the first prompt. This seems quite unethical given they advertise 128k context, and I doubt it's an accident (since it runs in the direction of cost savings).