middayc

15 ms·

151.
by middayc 3y ago
Hm. Interesting proposition. Rye inherited email and URL data types from Rebol. I haven't done that much on them specifically, because they aren't that crucial to the design of the language dynamics, so their implementation certai
152.
by middayc 3y ago
Rebol (where Rye took this from) is many times associated with Tcl. I've heard good things about it, but haven't really tried it yet.
153.
by middayc 3y ago
Hi, you can see a smaller example on ryelang.org front page if you ctrl+f "validation". Here are unit tests / reference for the validation dialect, but they aren't the best source of information: https://ryela
154.
by middayc 3y ago
Yes, op and pipe words are the biggest or the most visual addition to Rebol's base idea. Without them if you replace { } with [ ] it's basically just Rebol ... well, with some different details around contexts (rebol's bindol
155.
by middayc 3y ago
Yes, as samatman said, main reason is that blocks of (code or data there is no difference) don't evaluate so they are passed as function arguments and the function can potentially evaluate them. So if is a function that accepts two a
156.
by middayc 3y ago
This was written in 2021, maybe it's really not that great of a blogpost. I wrote a lot of blogposts from many angles back then, mostly to myself as there weren't many readers, trying to see the language from the outside, to self-
157.
by middayc 3y ago
Thank you. Rye author here (I posted this link on lobste.rs and it got here). It seems we have very similar paths. I was also or still am in a way a Rebol developer, although it's more or less abandoned. For few years I was in Factor w
158.
Go's concurrency in a dynamic language Rye(ryelang.org)
2 points by middayc 3y ago|0 comments
159.
Rye's Simple Evaluation Rules(ryelang.org)
2 points by middayc 3y ago|0 comments
160.
Rye Block Structures(ryelang.org)
2 points by middayc 3y ago|0 comments
161.
by middayc 3y ago
Feedback is welcome, especially on anything I should make clearer/more understandable.
162.
Rye language got a website, first reference docs ...(ryelang.org)
2 points by middayc 3y ago|1 comments
163.
by middayc 3y ago
Hi, just btw ... I've been developing a language called Rye - hence ryelang.org for few years now.
164.
Talking in Rye over Telegram(ryelang.org)
1 points by middayc 3y ago|0 comments
165.
Ryelang Demo: CSV, Spreadsheets, HTTP and Postmark – Asciinema(asciinema.org)
2 points by middayc 3y ago|0 comments
166.
Receiving emails with Go's smtpd and Rye(ryelang.blogspot.com)
1 points by middayc 3y ago|0 comments
167.
Ryelang – controlled file serving example and comparison to Python(ryelang.blogspot.com)
1 points by middayc 3y ago|0 comments
168.
by middayc 5y ago
We had a major tragedy near my town because of this. 13 people died, also its mayor and many local officials. They organised "the last descent" before the river bed would be floded for the hydroelectric power plant. https:/&
169.
by middayc 9y ago
> then there is simply no way for anyone to send $99 to try to get at that randomnes can't I send one of the 10 people $99 today, and he pays me out in 10 days? Can't that person rent the fact he/she is on the list of 10
170.
by middayc 13y ago
Ok, based on yours and many other similar comments below I only now see where my argument isn't understood as I wanted it to be. Not that I think that now you and others will agree with me, but just to make this clear. I do not think t
171.
by middayc 13y ago
I am not sure if I intuitively know it or do we have to consciously compute / infer it? (the coin/card example). I guess I have some aprox feeling, but it's highly susceptible to being skewed.
172.
by middayc 13y ago
I am not saying that it doesn't use something that efectively is a probability calculation anywhere in the system, but that that isn't the main or the most important "engine". I agree with your comment on "first lea
173.
by middayc 13y ago
I see now that I probably didn't express myself well. I am not saying we should understand probability but the result of our instincts should be in tune with probabilistic results on the problem. For example: We would not naturally fea
174.
by middayc 13y ago
My argument doesn't assume that we don't have unconscious processes. Maybe I didn't express well what I think. I do think we have multiple "minds" (I even wrote a blogpost on this subject on another blog once). Mayb
175.
by middayc 13y ago
but the baseball player with exceptional h-e coordination would catch the ball without learning about math or calculus behind it. We suck at probabilities naturally / don't catch the ball naturally. Otherwise I agree with what you
176.
by middayc 13y ago
you are right about the title, sorry. is there a consensus/definition on what is AI without relying on what animal/human intell. looks like/functions?
177.
by middayc 13y ago
so you think that we use probability (and are good at it) on a low level but that doesn't translate to being sufficient in probability on a higher level. Where is the border between low and high? I am not saying any probabilistic intel
178.
by middayc 13y ago
good one, I accept it :) edit: so you think human intelligence is mainly a probability machine?
179.
Probabilistic AI can't be AI(refaktorlabs.blogspot.com)
9 points by middayc 13y ago|29 comments
180.
Silk Road’s rival offline, another black drug mart mulls shutdown(rt.com)
1 points by middayc 13y ago|0 comments

More ›