Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
memset
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
121.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
That sweater is one of my favorite items, thank you :) The goal is for this to be able to run well on commodity hardware, which I think is possible. If I can run this on $platform with $cheap instances and an $autoscaler then that would be
122.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
The only HTTP API that is exposed is actually the SQS one. (I'm not opposed to a "regular" HTTP API but the goal was to make it easy for people to use existing libraries.) If you do use your language's AWS SDK, the code
123.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
I haven't tried this with litestream! It will be worth exploring that as a replication strategy. The nice thing about queues is that backend storage doesn't really need to be coordinated. Like, you could have two servers, with two
124.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Curious: if you were going to switch, how would you want to run this? Would you want to deploy it to your own EC2 instances, or would you want a hosted solution (just as SQS itself is?)
125.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Thank you! Yes, you should definitely use this instead of localstack :)
126.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Can you tell me more about why you needed this (and what you ended up using?) Totally agree on adding more metrics and information to the UI - but how much of that should be on the dashboard vs exposed as a prometheus metric for someone to
127.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
This is a great question and something I've been thinking about a lot. Big picture: Each queue node can operate (mostly) independently, and this is good. As a consumer, I don't really care where my next message comes from, so I ca
128.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Thank you for the feedback - agree on the gif. Also it should probably show real messages an an example instead of rand(). re: maintenance - I have tried to build this to be hands-off. The only storage this uses is SQLite, and I have the co
129.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
I was not aware of testcontainer until you just mentioned it! I have a very basic Dockerfile for deploying to fly.io. What/how would I get started? It looks like localstack is a supported testcontainer and they do support SQS (but I ha
130.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Truthfully, I don't know yet - I haven't even built a paid/hosted version at all. It is related to my existing business in the sense that it deals with realtime data. But I started working this as something I wish existed as
131.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
I'm using WAL mode - I'd almost given up on sqlite until I remembered to enable it. I've been playing with benchmarks, yes! I haven't written them up yet because I worry about doing them the "right" way. but si
132.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
MongoDB is web scale :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs
133.
▲
Show HN: Drop-in SQS replacement based on SQLite
(github.com)
656 points
by
memset
2y ago
|
156 comments
134.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
This is really cool! My big problem with most document software is: 1. Everything is locked in. I want to be able to easily export or back up my notes. 2. The pricing is so nickel and dimey. Have more than 100 nodes in the document tree? Up
135.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
The is only 1 reason for me: slack connect. Whenever I sign up a new customer, they get a slack channel where they can talk with our team. By far the best way to do this is to connect our slacks. With anything else they'd have to log i
136.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Could you share a very small code snippet describing what you mean by bound method pointers? (Huge fan of rclone!)
137.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
It may be that lambdas (cloud functions, etc) have become more popular and supported on other platforms. When you enqueue something, you eventually need to dequeue and process it. A lambda just does that in a single call. It also removes th
138.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Can you share an example on how to use it? For example, start with some example data as the input?
139.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Also xbar: https://github.com/matryer/xbar
140.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Awesome! What's the process for self-hosting?
141.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Ask your target customers specifically! You can have the best of both worlds with tiered pricing. $20/month for x usage, plus $y for overages.
142.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
This is a very intuitive list. I'm going to try some of these things this week. (I'll keep everyone posted.)
143.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Porkbun
144.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Feedback: can there be a big “loom” on the homepage showing how it works or what differentiates it? Right now we only see tweets but nothing that gives me the “aha” moment to want to try it out. Make me remember the pain, and show me really
145.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
Just to address this comment chain: loom does make it easier to do screen recordings and demos, and additionally has features like timestamped comments and notes and sharing functionality. The target customer is a business who is making dem
146.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
I disagree - the fact you don’t know what Loom is probably means you’re not in the market for this kind of software. Better, at this stage, to focus on users who will immediately get it rather than explain to folks who don’t currently have
147.
▲
California says restaurants must bake all of their add-on fees into menu prices
(npr.org)
96 points
by
memset
2y ago
|
196 comments
148.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
> Surely I think it would be great if postgres supported parquet out of the box. However I am not sure that this is the "best" solution - it would take years for the data load to finish if we had to wait for that!
149.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
The article isn't particularly about Parquet or S3. They are both great technologies and I use them all the time. I mentioned CSV because it is the only format supported by Postgres for ingest (besides their binary protocol) but that i
150.
▲
by
memset
2y ago
That is what tipped me over the edge for this little rant. I've talked to a lot of folks who don't have a background in the data ecosystem and want to do fairly mundane things ("copy data out of a parquet file into a regular
More ›