3 ms·
Thank you! Yes, you should definitely use this instead of localstack :)
by memset 2y ago
Thank you! Yes, you should definitely use this instead of localstack :)
- thrauat 2y agoAlthough I wouldn't recommend using LocalStack's SQS implementation for production workloads, calling it a dumb mock is a bit outdated. It emulates pretty much every SQS behvaior including long polling, delayed messages, visibility timeouts, DLQ redrive, batch send/receive, ...