mejari

29 ms·

271.
by mejari 11y ago
Very true, I guess my question is about the intentionality of it. I doubt you intentionally trained your dog to respond to your moods, but he/she did it anyway. The claim here is that officers are doing this intentionally in order to g
272.
by mejari 11y ago
The article only discusses that the handler gives the dog treats for alerting, it doesn't go into the motivations about that, whether they're because the officers aren't considering the Pavlovian conditioning involved and are
273.
by mejari 11y ago
Thank you. It is kind of the videographer's assertion that "Check here" is a command to trigger instead of just a command to check there, however, isn't it?
274.
by mejari 11y ago
This is something I see claimed a lot. I'd be very interested in any information you have about this. I find it very unlikely this kind of training is part of the official training, so I'm imagining it's some kind of unintent
275.
by mejari 11y ago
Have you worked on software projects before? Differing priority levels for GUI consistency and base functionality is not an odd thing, and being bad on one does not really mean you're bad at the other. Plus the people making the label
276.
by mejari 11y ago
That is certainly quite a bit of not useful hyperbole. What connection do you think that GUI dialog styling and security/compatibility have?
277.
by mejari 11y ago
Is this really a helpful or reasonable comment?
278.
by mejari 11y ago
>"Would you like to store a backup for your drive encryption password on Microsoft OneDrive? If you choose not to do so, and you forget your password, all of your data will be lost. [Yes/No]" You know when most people care
279.
by mejari 11y ago
You misread their comment
280.
by mejari 11y ago
Where is this quote from?
281.
by mejari 11y ago
I already addressed why this is not sufficient: >And just saying "It's simpler" means nothing, because being simple isn't a benefit all on it's own. Does it being simpler mean X number of increased work hours bec
282.
by mejari 11y ago
Yes, I understand all that, but it's still not an answer to the question of what, given the facts as they are, the benefits are that make it worth going against that inertia. (Also: The only discussion on potential benefits in your lin
283.
by mejari 11y ago
>The only reason US doesn't switch is inertia (i.e. habit), and not concerns like "how it can improve things" You say that like they're two different things. No one does anything just because. The benefits of switchin
284.
by mejari 11y ago
Just providing that as an example. The same points hold true for temperature. Why is it more simple and more uniform from the perspective of a society that is mostly non metric ? What problems would switching solve that people actually dea
285.
by mejari 11y ago
But how are those problems to drivers today? The vast majority of drivers don't drive between multiple systems very often, so within their experience it is uniform. And what is simpler about km vs miles, given that everyone already kno
286.
by mejari 11y ago
You didn't actually answer the question of what problem it solves, you just stated that it is a problem.
287.
by mejari 11y ago
So that is probably why they specifically call out that the type of carrageenan in 1.5 is not the same type people have been complaining about.
288.
by mejari 11y ago
Would you mind explaining why that's unfortunate?
289.
by mejari 11y ago
I guess it just comes down to comparing two different things. Yes, you have to do more setup with React because React isn't what Ext is. But if you set up your React to the point that Ext is at, with data binding and error handling and
290.
by mejari 11y ago
It's not the over-theming (although that is part of what creates that easily-recognizable Ext-ness), it's the strictness with which they expect you to use their components. If you want a dropdown that functions exactly the way Ext
291.
by mejari 11y ago
Except ReactJS and Angular are not the same class of thing. It's more like comparing an Intel CPU and an AMD motherboard.
292.
by mejari 11y ago
We're in the process of migrating from ExtJS to React, and it is, to put it simply, awesome. Ext was great when we started because it gave us all these great out-of-the-box components to just mix and match and shove things together and
293.
by mejari 11y ago
> it's essentially saying "we have something to hide" (like bad performance...), or "we don't want competition" This seems a totally imaginary dichotomy when literally the comment you're replying to pre
294.
by mejari 11y ago
so they'd be iojs.io?
295.
by mejari 11y ago
>Does Apple review and reject apps that have a rendering engine This is the answer
296.
by mejari 11y ago
Are you aware of the number of speculative lawsuits done for more noble purposes? I'm not, but it seems like you'd have to know that if you were to claim that they aren't worth it.
297.
by mejari 11y ago
At that point you're just saying "trolls are bad", because you're not offering any way for the law to differentiate between a "good" NPE (our lone inventor) and a "bad" NPE (the trolls). How do you li
298.
by mejari 11y ago
You'd be surprised how hard it is to convince people to risk a 10-20% chance of losing literally everything you have in order to sue. Even with the strongest case no litigation is a sure thing, and if being unlucky in your case means y
299.
by mejari 11y ago
Ancestry.com still exists as a (paid) service, they just shut down this subset of their offering, so it's definitely not "nobody left to turn on the lights".
300.
by mejari 12y ago
>You should have added "I think it's not sad", because it's your opinion Then why didn't you add that when you said >it is a shame that some judge can decide what is reasonable and what isn't when that is

More ›