mejari

55 ms·

301.
by mejari 12y ago
No, that is a real button on the real GitHub. If you have it installed it opens the GitHub client and clones the repo
302.
by mejari 12y ago
I guess I'd ask again, do you critique Hacker News for this? It is definitely not a new idea to reuse existing ideas, even if you don't reuse existing code, to provide previously unserved/underserved markets with already exis
303.
by mejari 12y ago
Why nobody else tried offering an existing solution to a new market? Is that a serious question? That exact thing happens all the time and has made many companies very successful. Hell, the site you're on right now isn't exactly r
304.
by mejari 12y ago
If you can find an underserved market that would benefit from such a service then yes, you quite clearly could make money doing that. I'm not sure what you're getting at.
305.
by mejari 12y ago
>Now I'll have to maintain markup/presentation/logic in the same place Only if you're doing it wrong. Presentation logic and markup will be in the same place sure, that's a good thing, but any application logic n
306.
by mejari 12y ago
>You guys have to convince us first that mixing content+structure/presentation/logic is the best way to go forward in web development for the following reasons 1,2,3 ..etc. There are a million articles and talks that provide ex
307.
by mejari 12y ago
>We should think on our own and figure what works for us and not blindly follow But doesn't your last comment rail against all these "fanbois" not blindly following "best practices" and actually attempting to fin
308.
by mejari 12y ago
Why are you looking at this as "bending the rules" instead of as creating new rules for a new way of building web applications? Just hand-waving "best practices" doesn't actually mean that something is best practice
309.
by mejari 12y ago
>You're assuming all recognition algorithms of the same biometric produce the same raw template. That if I get one I can gain access on another. Well, is that an unreasonable assumption? With passwords knowing what one person's
310.
by mejari 12y ago
"A biometric is both a 'username' and a 'password' " This is true, but usually people don't go around showing their passwords to any camera they walk by or surface they touch. That is why people say that i
311.
by mejari 12y ago
Same thing, really, in this context. The biometrics are what uniquely identify someone (username, UUID, whatever). The password is what provides authorization. The problem is biometrics are being treated as both the identifier and the autho
312.
by mejari 12y ago
You could say this for literally any technology. I don't understand your point.
313.
by mejari 13y ago
"You put those words in my mouth, buddy" To be fair, just a few comments up you said "I think you'll like this:" and then posted a link to a comic making fun of 'socially awkward', 'atheist', &#x
314.
by mejari 14y ago
The guy in the 8,000 dollar suit is going to jail because of ads, COME ON
315.
by mejari 14y ago
Completely misleading title and ludicrous article. FYI, what was actually said was “It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable law
316.
by mejari 14y ago
Maybe it's because you feel the need to use holier-than-thou language like "No food for your thick sarcasm." and "It is somehow nice to "suffer" for truth."