3 ms·
I already addressed why this is not sufficient: >And just saying "It's simpler" means nothing, because being simple isn't a benefit all on it's own. Does it be
by mejari 11y ago
I already addressed why this is not sufficient:
>And just saying "It's simpler" means nothing, because being simple isn't a benefit all on it's own. Does it being simpler mean X number of increased work hours because we aren't wasting time converting? Does it being simpler mean Y fewer accidents on the road or in the workplace? These are reasons, not just "it's simpler".
What are the tangible benefits to people's lives that "uniformity" would bring? And do you think they outweigh the benefits of continuing to use our existing system? Why or why not?