meh8881

7 ms·

31.
by meh8881 4y ago
Those roles are not representative of the typical worker 500 years ago at all
32.
by meh8881 4y ago
The Russian Air Force has been very much active. They have not achieved air superiority because their planes generally cannot deal with anti air setups. But they’re still using planes and helicopters frequently.
33.
by meh8881 4y ago
False flag attacks are very much real and are pretty well documented in this very war. They are generally not well executed and come off as very obvious. At least by Russia. This incident does appear to be an accident however.
34.
by meh8881 4y ago
It’s very interesting how old people think they have superior wisdom, when in fact they’ve merely grown confident on the worst human biases and instincts.
35.
by meh8881 4y ago
It widely used in the context of OpenAI’s model specifically. It is also a trademarked term.
36.
by meh8881 4y ago
This article is explicitly wondering why people don’t live closer to friends, explicitly preferring friends over family. I don’t think it’s surprising personally.
37.
by meh8881 4y ago
Now serving Coca-Cola!* *(not Coca-Cola)
38.
by meh8881 4y ago
It sounds like you are arguing nuclear power is expensive, dangerous, and will only work with massive taxpayer subsidies; but we should ignore all of that because we don’t have a viable alternative. I don’t think we should ignore those stat
39.
by meh8881 4y ago
None of these points seem to address the parent’s point which was that restarting a nuclear plant that is much older than its intended lifespan is not safe. “No more criticisms without solutions” is not a real argument. Obviously criticisms
40.
by meh8881 4y ago
They are very poor predictors of things. Those factors are not significant effects on personality.
41.
by meh8881 4y ago
A personality framework is a descriptor of reality. Not a predictor. Your comment is nonsensical.
42.
by meh8881 4y ago
I actually asked 3.5 to do this and it chose the thumb’s down, amusingly. I asked it to explain why it chose that and it told me that as an AI model it could not choose emojis.
43.
by meh8881 4y ago
It cannot remain a holding company if these businesses are expected to IPO though, can it?
44.
by meh8881 4y ago
I think there is some irony in claiming a certain behavior seems to be distinct to one personality archetype as evidence that the personality framework is meaningless.
45.
by meh8881 4y ago
Personality varying with context is a well accepted concept. Most of these kinds of tests acknowledge it.
46.
by meh8881 4y ago
Star signs are the belief that you have a label which causes you have traits. A personality framework assigns you a label based on the traits you have. They’re basically the opposite of each other.
47.
by meh8881 4y ago
I don’t think I would say the same of Amazon if we split it up into those things, minus the digital mapping and food delivery which honestly sounds like the worst of them anyway. > Alibaba's new "Logistics" spin-off will
48.
by meh8881 4y ago
Are these businesses really viable individually?
49.
by meh8881 4y ago
Alright this one annoyed me enough to look it up. First of all Peterson’s claim is 83, not 85. Second, The military does not test IQ. It has a different test with a decent correlation. This test scores in percentiles however. And the bottom
50.
by meh8881 4y ago
I disagree. We cannot expect these tools to work if we don’t communicate what we want from them. Can’t do that for humans either. We shouldn’t be confusing clear communication with “prompt engineering”.
51.
by meh8881 4y ago
But you can do a task you’ve done before with poor specification too. Sure, maybe it is contamination. But who cares? We only ought to judge the tool on its performance for carrying out good instructions.
52.
by meh8881 4y ago
That’s not my point. Maybe it is parroting a solution for something it has seen before, but still capable of writing solutions to problems it has not seen before when they’re well specified. The presence of contamination does not mean the g
53.
by meh8881 4y ago
This guy seems to laugh away the fact that he gave the prompt in terribly broken and chunked up formats. I don’t think it’s surprising the model did poorly. Maybe the contamination issue is true. But maybe it’s also true that the model does
54.
by meh8881 4y ago
You think 15% of the population is too dumb to deliver packages? More than 1 in 10 people is not smart enough to pack things?
55.
by meh8881 4y ago
I’m not sure what you mean. There’s one shot in the video where they show a full motion rig and clearly explain that this system works with both a phone and/or a professional stereo system. I’m guessing that is for when you want to mov
56.
by meh8881 4y ago
I’m under the impression the Fortnite drives Unreal and is usually running on advanced versions of the engine not released to the public.
57.
by meh8881 4y ago
I’ve played around with it (the initial version). I didn’t think LiveLink was good enough personally.
58.
by meh8881 4y ago
What do you do with those app outputs though? I’m guessing it still feels hard because it won’t automatically map to a mesh that is good to go in your game engine? The MetaHumans drop in models are the thing that makes this magic imo. It’s
59.
by meh8881 4y ago
The ratio of skilled : unskilled jobs. As well as the general decline in what constitutes a skilled job.
60.
by meh8881 4y ago
You can do it on an iPhone with no additional equipment and can apply it to a MetaHuman model, which is a relatively high quality human model that epic has tools to generate.

More ›