meerita

75 ms·

961.
by meerita 7y ago
It is matter of time this will happen. Even with self-driving cars. Using people to do this is just killing people. Think all the mental effort that has to be done to censor. Humans aren't that perfect and cannot oversee the entire FB
962.
by meerita 7y ago
What these people do not understand is that, after millennia evolving morphologically, we have done it thanks to consume meat (both flesh and organs). Yes, good quality meat, full of saturated fats, blood. This is how we have developed our
963.
by meerita 7y ago
"If kiddie porn, gore and animal cruelty flooded the network, it would cease to be a destination visited by people that advertisers will pay to reach." I bet this can be done with ML and IA instead human power. Yet, FB uses their
964.
by meerita 7y ago
"1. The world could use an online independent currency" If it is owned, it not independent.
965.
by meerita 7y ago
It's funny to see that all grids fail on the web. Every single example i've checked the grid was 1-2 pixels off. It looked good, but it didn't match.
966.
by meerita 7y ago
Specially if you work with reactive HTMl, like VUE or React. It's a win. Even with old MVC frameworks you can work confortably and have inmeasurable performance and development speed. The CSS becomes so easy to read, mantain. Changing
967.
by meerita 7y ago
It matters. First, not all users need your huge CSS file, in terms of downloading. Specially when they're on mobile phones and cache is crap. A ~9000 rules CSS file will load and become COSSM slower than one that has 1000 or 10. It is
968.
by meerita 7y ago
I did many BEM projects. The idea behind Functional CSS is precisely that: let entire teams work without having to deal with naming. The project becames ultra-maintainable with the best legacy support. My experience and all the data I'
969.
by meerita 7y ago
Please, elaborate on the first statement. In CSS a class is a class, we're not tied to group things. Original CSS wasn't group purpose, mainly due the lack of properties, you could see more single or a couple of properties per cla
970.
by meerita 7y ago
I would not call them "best practices" anymore, since those practices only bring a notable decrease on loading, rendering and painting performance. As well a bloated architecture in the short term and a huge file size.
971.
by meerita 7y ago
Correct me, but I can tell what 16px is, not 1rem. 1rem can be 16px, 18px, 2000px. When you see tons of relative units, you need to doble check what it's going on. With pixels you see explicit values, so no double checkings.
972.
by meerita 7y ago
Show us a pastebin of your compiled CSS. I can tell you from now your CSS is bloated with the uncountable properties and classes that repeat the same fixes and structures. You can program functional CSS and get better in way.
973.
by meerita 7y ago
I've researched all the major newspapers code. From 1996 to 2019 and all of them grew exponentially in size and complexity. It is how you state it: the arquitectures force developers to do bad code. Unmantainable (most devs change jobs
974.
by meerita 7y ago
Yes, fotolog.com doesn't exist anymore but I would gladly elaborate. (full explanation here: http://minid.net/2019/04/07/the-css-utilitarian-methodology/ ) resume: why go with an OO architecture, whe
975.
by meerita 7y ago
Also: * http://minid.net/2019/04/07/the-css-utilitarian-methodology/ * https://github.com/meerita/utilcss
976.
by meerita 7y ago
To me this way to CSS development is outdated. I will never program like this anymore. I only do functional/utilitarian CSS.
977.
by meerita 7y ago
I'm using also Feedly and I am a happy user. It feels so good to read blogs, much rewarding than social networks.
978.
by meerita 7y ago
They went full corporate so far, I had a meeting with one of their salesman 2 years ago and they're mostly on corporate accounts business. Their software, as well competitors is so bloated.
979.
by meerita 7y ago
I got dizzy trying to read all the info. I barely read something. Just scanned for words and numbers. Why such psycodelic style for something interesting?
980.
by meerita 7y ago
I remember 25k SGI workstations back then
981.
by meerita 7y ago
We never relied only on client side.
982.
by meerita 7y ago
We got blocked by a majority of users using uBlock, AdBlock, etc.
983.
by meerita 7y ago
They did a horrible redesign, killing amazing UX and UI in favor of a hypter design fantasy. This one still shows the hangover. I feel really sad and bad for the those amazing guys who made the Dropbox product I've used back then when
984.
by meerita 7y ago
I worked in a 15m/year revenue product for 3 years. Our Analytic system was screw by cookie messages and now GDPR. Marketeers wanted to serve Analytics through Google Tag Manager, which helped customers to block our analytics launcher,
985.
by meerita 7y ago
Sorry, but where is the value on this project? Only 2 screens, one that has your profile photo and some description with a style on it and another screen with the same link to go back to Instagram. I find this surprisingly useless but I wis
986.
by meerita 7y ago
Nice, that sounds amazing to take pills instead eat natural food. B12 synthetic, or Cyanocobalamin, is the most dangerous thing you can eat. You can become inmune to B12, and increase your deficiency and, die faster, basically. Check papers
987.
by meerita 7y ago
You suspect wrong. Plants don't have 15 basic nutrients. Including Vitamin D, B, B12, A, K. All from animals. Carnosite, Carnitite, etc. If you eat grass feed animals, fish, local diary products, quit carbs, sugar and processed food yo
988.
by meerita 7y ago
Design by consensus, the worst thing ever. A Volvo is a Porsche designed by commitee.
989.
by meerita 7y ago
Good luck trying to get all the 15 nutrients that only are present on animal food.
990.
by meerita 7y ago
No, not at all. Do not lean to plant based foods or grains. Grains and plants contains antinutrients. Plants don't want to be eaten, same grains. They've contain not only toxins but also many antinutrients. If anyone wants to have

More ›