Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mawise
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Whats the source of that image? It looks like a suspicious result, for example the white shirt is lost in the "upscaled" image. Was is trained on a specific set of images to prove this point?
92.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Good read! Aligns a lot with everything happening with the IndieWeb community[1] (including social readers[2]) and what I'm working on with Haven[3]. The additional piece (I know, more parts make everything harder for everyone) is us
93.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
For those with even younger kids (they say ages 5-7), you might enjoy checking out Scratch Jr[1]. Building-block style programming with lots of examples for kids to get started on their own! (No affiliation, I just loved what happened whe
94.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Good on you for offering another passkey solution! I really want more non-Google/Apple options. I'll check it out.
95.
▲
Future of Social Media
(rohanrd.xyz)
1 points
by
mawise
4y ago
|
0 comments
96.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
My pet peeve is when the app moves focus after rendering useful content. On Outlook 365, I'll start typing an email, and then as page load finishes(?) it moves my cursor off the email field and my keystrokes get interpreted as keyboard
97.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Thats exactly what my vision is for comments on Haven[1]. Without webmentions, you're just telling your friends/followers what you think which enables private comments/conversations on public content. [1]: https://h
98.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Signal to noise in the context of discovery of public content is just hard. If you remove discovery, or limit it to curated content you can get around it. Haven[1] (my project) skips discovery and makes every source for your feed opt-in,
99.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
> I am wondering what will happen if RSS readers find a way to share comments on posts The IndieWeb community is focused on this with Social Readers[1] and Webmentions[2]. The core idea is your reader also ties into your own published f
100.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
I've been really excited about the potential use of HE for private messaging. Today the most anyone does is end-to-end encryption, which does a great job protecting what you're saying, but it fails to protect who you are talking
101.
▲
The Lie That Facebook Sold You
(havenweb.org)
73 points
by
mawise
4y ago
|
97 comments
102.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
IndieAuth[1] is a slick DNS-based approach. Maybe offering that as a service would be a nice alternative. I point my DNS to you, and you handle authentication for everything that uses IndieAuth. If you go away or I don't like what y
103.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
I need a better word that Blog for Haven (feel free to make suggestions!) because 'Blog' comes with all the connotations of public posting--but everything on Haven is private. So it's worse than creating an account, you need
104.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Slick, I'll have to think about that some.
105.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Is it possible for a bookmarklet to be able to find RSS autodiscovery[1] links? I've thought about building something like that but I've always been turned off by the "allow reading everything" permission. [1]: https:&#
106.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Opt-in is key, thats how I made spam a non-issue on Haven[1]. And really it isnt anything super creative, anyone using an RSS reader for primary consumption gets the same benefits. [1] https://havenweb.org
107.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Thank you for the offer! I'll reach out directly and we can chat more.
108.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
The only thing special about Haven is that access is restricted for the content you publish. Anything that publishes and consumes RSS (so long as it supports HTTP Basic Auth) will play nicely with Haven. I have to add that caveat because s
109.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Yup! RSS is RSS! If you want to follow a Haven feed, you just need to make sure your newsreader can handle HTTP Basic Auth credentials. A Haven feed URL embeds the credentials right in the URL to make it easier. And Haven's feed read
110.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
+1 for RSS, I leaned on RSS as my protocol-of-choice for Haven[1], and even added a built-in RSS feed-reader. It provides a single chronologically-ordered stream of content from all your feeds which I've found makes it much more pleas
111.
▲
The Lie That Facebook Sold You
(havenweb.org)
4 points
by
mawise
4y ago
|
0 comments
112.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
It's definitely a risk. I remember talking with peers in undergrad about the campus bubble we lived in compared to the surrounding community (which was not as affluent). Ultimately I think people need safe spaces to explore ideas. I
113.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
I'll chime in here, since I'm building one. Twitter does one thing that I opted to change--everything is public. The short-form, low-effort, public posting that defines twitter leads to a platform that promotes trolling over dis
114.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
> A lot of times something like this is how you form some new regulations - it's truly one of those "You know, this was excellent but we can't do it again" situations. That's exactly what happened in the cycling
115.
▲
The Verifiable Credential Selector
(developer.tbd.website)
1 points
by
mawise
4y ago
|
0 comments
116.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
Cory Doctorow wrote about this a little while ago[1], he's been using the term "Chokepoint Capitalism" [1]: https://doctorow.medium.com/what-is-chokepoint-capitalism-b8...
117.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
There was a Strong Towns article recently with a similar exploration. Their proposal was that this is actually an economically viable approach for developers to rebuild an entire block. https://www.strongtowns.org/journal&#
118.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
There's a cool approach called Transit Oriented Development[1]. You build a corridor of public-transit, and rezone the area around the corridor for higher density. Then it becomes economically viable for developers to build higher de
119.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
I bet they used Domain Connect[1]! That's the mainstream cross-service domain management protocol, but they require each service explicitly register with each domain registrar. I also don't think any of the companies involved ar
120.
▲
by
mawise
4y ago
You're 100% on this. That seems to be the whole point of DIDs, but under today's internet I think BYOD and domain ownership is a better solution. That said, none of the registrars seem to be working towards end-user domain owners
More ›