matz1

77 ms·

811.
by matz1 7y ago
Agree with him, we need to evolve and adapt. Relying on privacy is not feasible going forward. Instead of privacy we need to strive to minimize the damage due the information being online.
812.
by matz1 7y ago
>Do you make your mortgage or rent payments 6 months to a year in advance Depends on the situation, yes. >If not, why do you expect landlords to do the same? If the landlord want to reduce the risk of non payment, then they better be
813.
by matz1 7y ago
Then the landlord bear the risk of non payment.
814.
by matz1 7y ago
Of course there is pros and cons in every situation, but if you want to ensure getting paid, you want to be paid upfront.
815.
by matz1 7y ago
The mistake is the landlord didn't take payment upfront, 6 month / 1 year.
816.
by matz1 7y ago
And moral is subjective. There is no one "right" course of action.
817.
by matz1 7y ago
It goes both way. As a worker you too have to realize its just business, nothing personal about it. Learn to accept the situation and adapt.
818.
by matz1 7y ago
Is it really surprising ? Not everyone wired the same. For some people they think its fun. Its just human.
819.
by matz1 7y ago
Then who is going to work if you can get paid for not working ?
820.
by matz1 7y ago
Its not going to work, if you pay people to not work, who is going to work then ? Money will become useless.
821.
by matz1 7y ago
Yes but the risk is lower then not having grocery store at all. People still need to eat.
822.
by matz1 7y ago
Maybe but most people don't, I certainly don't. I care cheaper price and fast shipping.
823.
by matz1 7y ago
Exactly, thats the reality. Amazon is not charity.
824.
by matz1 7y ago
If the strike is not effective then there is no point to reinvestment into the worker demand.
825.
by matz1 7y ago
That entirely depends on how effective the strike is.
826.
by matz1 7y ago
He already is, bezos reinvested much of amazon profit back to amazon.
827.
by matz1 7y ago
Amazon or jeff wouldn't be as it is if they giving out money for nothing.
828.
by matz1 7y ago
Disagree, government interest is not be universal.
829.
by matz1 7y ago
Best use of housing is whatever the owner think its best for. There is no single answer.
830.
by matz1 7y ago
>If you could post your real name, address, phone number, email, sexual orientation, religion, employment status, performance review, salary, hobbies, political viewpoints etc we can get started processing your revocation of privacy. Eve
831.
by matz1 7y ago
>The consequences of privacy loss can be severe, up to and including violent death (partner violence, anti-LGBTI attacks, religious persecution) If you are going that way then likewise, there is always someone somewhere could die because
832.
by matz1 7y ago
It goes both way, if you force privacy, you too are excluding people for whom the cost vs benefit is the other way
833.
by matz1 7y ago
You have hold a principle because the benefit is greater than the cost, otherwise whats good is a principle ? Or maybe people has different principle.
834.
by matz1 7y ago
Likewise you are affecting others too by telling people to install other app. Lets not kid ourselves not everyone value privacy the same.
835.
by matz1 7y ago
In the end, its cost vs benefit. Does the benefit overweight the cost ? For most people, including me the answer is Yes.
836.
by matz1 7y ago
Maybe but still not everyone is the same, is it surprising that not everyone has the same level of empathy or even same definition of empathy ?
837.
by matz1 7y ago
People's moral framework can be different. Is is surprising that not everyone find this a moral dilemma ?
838.
by matz1 7y ago
well, if you want to have the law to restrict Alexa then you have to convince people about the risk.
839.
by matz1 7y ago
Sure, they can try to convince people to spend money but you don't have to follow it, and then there is adblocker too.
840.
by matz1 7y ago
Not sure if you are being snarky. Do you have anything to add ?

More ›