3 ms·
Yes but the risk is lower then not having grocery store at all. People still need to eat.
by matz1 7y ago
Yes but the risk is lower then not having grocery store at all. People still need to eat.
- zzzeek 7y agoright well to solve that problem, you close down one store and not all of them. only the one where someone tested positive and only until that store can be cleaned. There are no towns on the planet that have only a Whole Foods and not 350 other food stores. you open the store again once it's been deep cleaned. nobody starves and that's a total straw man argument.