Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
matz1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
93 ms
·
841.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Yes it will be leaked or hacked eventually. That is given.
842.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Everything has a trade off, you have to look at it using cost benefit analysis.
843.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
How exactly is advertising industry harming me ? Especially compared to the benefit I get ?
844.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
I want and expected it to listen to everything. Sure it can be used to harm me but it won't be a good business decision, on the other hand they can use the data improve the product and service for me.
845.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
In other word, the sky is blue, most people would prefer to see attractive people, its not rocket science. It would be stupid for tik tok to do otherwise.
846.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
No it's not, many people will agree that bunch of papers is not actual progress. Most people care the actual tangible stuff.
847.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Sure, you may call it anything else but don't call it actual progress.
848.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
The poster make a good point, bunch of papers is not actual progress, huge citation rings and mutual salary justifications is a big issue with these papers. An actual progress probably would be something like : effective cure for a disease
849.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Yes in the end its a preference, we have to make choices and I too would like to have the choice to buy unrepairable item. We too are "the society" so if we want to still have the option we have to fight the law. One thing to do i
850.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
yes they should.. but that is meaningless. If everyone do what they 'should' be doing, then we don't need law enforcement, do we ?
851.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Still a good strategy to be the first to implement. Collect the profit as much as you can, then move on.
852.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Your site doesn't seem to allow login with just phone number ?
853.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
People can lose access to cash too, by theft or whatever. >Just imagine if you're accidentally identified as a financial supporter of terrorism or something like that, and your bank accounts are blocked Then make it illegal for bank
854.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Then make it an obligation to take you as costumer or make a public alternative.
855.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>That is like saying that we have to find a solution to crime and fraud so that we will not have to rely on physical locks, spamfilters, etc. That would be great. >It would be nice, but it will never happen. Sure, if that the attitude
856.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Yes, mitigating harm is the goal, how to do it is the issue. Trying to do that by hiding information, e.g anonymity is not feasible.
857.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Trying to stop technological progress by legislative measures seems to be much harder.
858.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>That we currently speak very openly on the net is such a treasure. With an open ID it would just end like China. There would be topics you just don't speak about because reputation damage wouldn't make it worth it. That would
859.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>Anonymity can supply that effortlessly Until the real name leaks, which is only matter of time. Anonymity is what i mean by fixing the issue by hiding the information. >If you post with your name, you have become a public persona. Ju
860.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
The wealthy will always have the edge, regardless how you deal with privacy, thats what the definition of wealthy. Wealthy = more power/resource. What I'm saying is, you can't solve privacy issue by hiding information. That i
861.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Yes, transparency is the only practical and realistic way to deal with privacy. Information want to be free. The sooner we learn to adapt and resolves issue due to our information being public the better.
862.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>That's why you don't make steak tartar from super market ground beef The risk are way overstated, no you are unlikely to get sick from eating super market ground beef raw.
863.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Yes and in addition I also pay with my data. I didn't simply donate my data. I expect the company to use my data and my money to improve the service. Even with money, the company is not obligated to improve service just because you pay
864.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
No since I'm not giving my data for free. I expect service improvement as a return.
865.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Its not charity, I allow them to collect my data so that they can use it to improve the service.
866.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Well yeah, they have to do that to for marketing. Its smart thing to do. I would do the same.
867.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
So using your numbers it took roughly 7 years to be a millionaire. Damn crazy good to me.
868.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
People are free to shame it too.
869.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
The value for the customer comes when they not opt in.
870.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>Not according to me, according to many in this thread, in dozens of articles posted on this site, and many more across the industry. Yes, that what said, but I doubt according to the people who do the hiring . It doesn't matter if
More ›