mathiasverraes

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mathiasverraes 5y ago

   I'm sorry you're having that experience. DDD is specifically aimed at tackling complexity, as it says on the cover. Part of the problem is that complexity is relative to the observer, how experienced they are in that particular do
2. 2.▲
   by mathiasverraes 5y ago

   The definition is highly summarised, which (like many definitions) makes it only useful if you already understand the concept, and you need a way to remember it. Or the definition can be a framework for explaining it to others, which is how
3. 3.▲
   by mathiasverraes 6y ago

   These articles are pretty much impossible to disagree with, because they follow the same pattern. Every tool, concept, or technology, that aims to address a common need, will eventually reach the point in their adoption curve where an autho
4. 4.▲
   by mathiasverraes 6y ago

   > The biggest flaw of DDD I've run into is there's no emphasis on when not to use it Except that there's literally an entire chapter in the book on Generic Subdomains. It says to move everything that is not the critical mo
5. 5.▲
   Domain-Driven Design is Linguistic(verraes.net)

   1 points by mathiasverraes 13y ago|0 comments