marshmellowtest

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by marshmellowtest 7y ago

   No thanks. It's a huge security dumpster fire as well.
2. 2.▲
   by marshmellowtest 7y ago

   Yes. Edited to clarify.
3. 3.▲
   by marshmellowtest 7y ago

   "resistance against addressed censorship" does not work at all when all your traffic is made public. People can be prosecuted or otherwise harassed for sharing contents on a P2P system. > It never looked like an anonymizing too
4. 4.▲
   by marshmellowtest 7y ago

   Saving Netflix's bandwith costs by sacrificing your privacy. IPFS and bittorrent don't do anything to protect the data you are uploading and your IP address. Case in point: https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/en/
5. 5.▲
   by marshmellowtest 7y ago

   Why the downvotes? It's a legitimate question: ME/AMT can be neutralized or disabled. Bios can be replaced with coreboot. Some buyers and some vendors actually care about security.
6. 6.▲
   by marshmellowtest 7y ago

   Indeed. Webshits alone are responsible for 1 or 2% of global energy usage.
7. 7.▲
   by marshmellowtest 7y ago

   No, we need "smart" appliances to adapt automatically.
8. 8.▲
   by marshmellowtest 8y ago

   Law is not a lean startup. In many countries there are constitutional principles to prevent arbitrary pardon. If a law was unjust all prisoners are freed.
9. 9.▲
   by marshmellowtest 8y ago

   Same for the large majority of people in Europe up to the 1940s. People would often "eat" meat only on Sundays by cooking a chunk in a soup. Then the elder in the family would eat the meat and everybody else would just taste it in