mariavillosa

3 ms·

1.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
>It’s pretty easy to opt out of corporate dystopia >People love to brag about how they quit social media. Social media is the tip of the dystopic iceberg
2.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
> That's not the purpose of the 1A. If you read 1A it's fairly basic. >Congress... Right, at the time of writing, that would have been perceived as the gravest threat to free expression. But I don't think that's st
3.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
Oh I was writing the same comment, you beat me to it, and more elegantly!
4.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
>Objective truth does not exist That's an objective truth claim right there!
5.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
>This has nothing to do with 1A. Businesses have the right to refuse service if you're being too loud in their establishment. Sorry, not sorry. If the purpose of 1a is to foster a society where speech is democratic, then it does, be
6.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
This is my perception as well. Not knocking either of those countries, just curious if they were thought to be bastions of enlightenment values.
7.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
But almost all countries are more liberal than those two. My question isn't if the US and UK are the least enlightened countries in the world, but rather, if people see them as particularly enlightened among countries. Ie compared to
8.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
>Is the government of the USA, UK, or other "enlightened" societies throughout history That sentence piques my interest, do people see the USA and UK that way? I think of Switzerland and Canada that way, for example, but my kno
9.
by mariavillosa 5y ago
just something that amused me :) hi
10.
My first time censored (Great Firewall)(mari.thoughts.page)
11 points by mariavillosa 5y ago|2 comments