> That's not the purpose of the 1A. If you read 1A it's fairly basic. >Congress... Right, at the time of writing, that would have been perceived as the gravest

> That's not the purpose of the 1A. If you read 1A it's fairly basic. >Congress... Right, at the time of writing, that would have been perceived as the gravest threat to free expression. But I don't think that's still the case. > Unless someone can prove people are being removed from platforms for reasons above companies are well within their rights to refuse service. Agreed completely, I'm not making a legal claim. My claim attempts to stand on the moral philosophy behind these laws.